Dismissed

Ramanjinappa v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC7 Apr 2021WP/6120/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by members of a milk producers cooperative society challenging the integrity of certain Sections. The court found the petition infructuous because elections were already conducted, and no further relief was available, reserving liberty to seek revival if advised.

What did the court decide?

None granted. Petition dismissed as infructuous. Liberty reserved.

Ramanjinappa Vs the State of Karnataka — Cooperative Societies | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF APRIL 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.6120 OF 2021 (CS-EL/M)

¶7

BETWEEN :

¶8

RAMANJINAPPA

¶9

S/O DASAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.320)

¶10

ANANDA T

¶11

S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.329)

¶12

SMT GOPAMMA W/O RAMANJINAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.346)

¶13

RAMNNA S/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.309)

¶14

HARISHKUMAR S/O S NAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.20)

¶15

SMT GO. PUTTAMMA W/O NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.29)

¶16

ANGADI KALAPPA S/O MUNIYAPPA

¶17

¶18

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.31)

¶19

8. ANJINAPPA M

¶20

S/O MUNISHYMAPPA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.43)

¶21

SMT DIVYA W/O KUMARA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.87)

¶22

MUNIRAJAPPA S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.114)

¶23

SMT VINODAMMA W/O GO. KEMPEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.342)

¶24

SMT COWDAMMA W/O MUNIRAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.140)

¶25

BOMARIYAPPA S/O CHIKKAPAPAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.146)

¶26

SMT ANJINAMMA M W/O PATALAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS MEMBERSHIP NO.183

¶27

SMT GOWRAMMA W/O GOPALAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.190)

¶28

MUNINARAYAPPA S/O MUNISHAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.221)

¶29

¶30

17.	SMT SAVITHA
	W/O MUNIRAJAPPA B (MEMBERSHIP NO.308)
18.	MUNIKRISHNAPPA S/O PILLAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.312)
19.	MURTHY M S/O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS MEMBERSHIP NO.314
20.	SMT JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O GOPALASWAMY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
	(MEMBERSHIP NO.316)
21.	S K BHAGAYAMMA W/O S P MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
	(MEMBERSHIP NO.317)
22.	RAJESH S/O DODDANANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.318)
23.	SMT PRAMILA S/O MANJUNATHA K AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.326)
24.	NARASIMAIAH A K S/O DODDAMUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
	(MEMBERSHIP NO.337)
25.	TA RAVIKUMAR S/O TA PILLAPPA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.343)
26.	SMT SUSHILA
	W/O S N RAJASHEKHAR
	AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

¶31

¶32

(MEMBERSHIP NO.330)

¶33

27.	SMT SUNITHA W/O CHIKKANARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.331)
28.	VENKATESH P S/O POOJAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.332)
29.	MANJUNATHA S K S/O VENKATARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.333)
30.	SMT MUNIRATHANMMA W/O SHA NARAJAYANAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.335)
31.	DEVARAJ S M S/O NARASHIMAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.327)
32.	SMT VEENA W/O HARISH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.339)
33.	MAMATHA W/O GOPAL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.351)
34.	MANIKUMAR
	S/O HO. KEMPANNA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.352)
35.	SMT MUNITHAYAMMA W/O M ANJINAPPA
	AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
	(MEMBERSHIP NO.353)

¶34

¶35

SMT MUNILAKSHMAMMA W/O S N DEVARAJ AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.355)

¶36

37. SIDDALINGAPPA

¶37

S/O BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.360)

¶38

38. MUNIRAJAPPA

¶39

S/O BU. CHENNAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.362)

¶40

39. HANUMANTHAPPA

¶41

S/O BUDAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.196)

¶42

K LALITHA W/O K MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.242)

¶43

41. THIMAPPA

¶44

S/O CHENAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.211)

¶45

NANJAPPA

¶46

S/O HANUMATHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.354)

¶47

MURTHY

¶48

S/O NANJAPPA AGED BOUT 34 YEARS (MEMBERSHIP NO.319)

¶49

ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE THE MEMBERS OF SAVAKANAHALLI MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. SAVAKANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI

¶50

¶51

DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110 …PETITIONERS

¶52

(BY SHRI. G. CHANDRASEKHARAIAH, ADVOCATE)

¶53

AND :

¶54

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA 6^TH FLOOR, 3^RD GATE, M S BUILDING DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001

¶55

THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT DEVANAHALLI BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110

¶56

THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION DODDABALLAPURA BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561 203

¶57

SAVAKANAHALLI MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., SAVAKANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110 REPT. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

¶58

THE CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DEVANAHALLI AND RETURNING OFFICER SAVAKANAHALLI MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. SAVAKANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 110

¶59

THE KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY

¶60

¶61

BMTC BUILDING, 3^RD FLOOR SHANTHINAGARA BENGALURU-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY ….RESPONDENTS

¶62

(BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)

¶63

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION 20(2)(a-iv) AND (a-v) OF SUB SECTION (2) OF SECTON 20 OF THE ACT AND SECTION 27-A OF THE ACT ARE ULTRA VIRES OF ARTICLE 243-ZI AND 243-ZO OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND THAT IS IT BEYOND THE LEGISLATIVE COMPETENCE OF THE STATE LEGISLATIVE AND ETC.

¶64

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶65

ORDER

¶66

Learned HCGP submits that in this petition,

¶67

petitioners have prayed for only voting rights. Elections have been conducted and nothing further survives for consideration. Her submission is placed on record.

¶68

In the circumstance, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous reserving liberty to petitioners to seek revival of the petition, if so advised.

No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Ramanjinappa v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramanjinappa v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Manjunatha Traders Vs Department of Mines and Geology

Puttaiah Vs the State of Karnataka

Narayanachari Vs the State of Karnataka

Shimsha Sahakara Bank Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri M S Nagaraj Vs the Registrar

Sri Prabhakar M Vs the State of Karnataka