The court dismissed a writ petition filed to quash a letter as infructuous, observing that the impugned letter had been withdrawn by the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.52478 OF 2019 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN :
M/S. VINNAV INFRATECK PVT. LTD. REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR SHRI. P. GIRIRAJU NO.90, 4TH MAIN ROAD NEW BEL ROAD, RMV II STAGE DEVASANDRA BENGALURU-560 094 …PETITIONER
(BY SHRI. T.M. VENKATA REDDY, ADVOCATE) [THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE]
AND :
BENGALURU-560 001
(BY SHRI. B. PRASAD, ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. N. AMARESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2; SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LETTER/ORDER DATED 19.11.2018 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AT ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.,
2
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri B.Prasad, learned advocate for respondent No.2 has filed a memo stating that letter/order dated 19.11.2018 in No.GTTC/PROJ/G'PET/BL/BD-54/2018-19 (Annexure-D) impugned in this writ petition has been withdrawn. Consequently, this writ petition is rendered infructuous.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
AV
M/S. VINNAV INFRATECK PVT. LTD.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
MANAGING DIRECTOR GOVERNMENT TOOL ROOM AND TRAINING CENTRE
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
