Dismissed

Smt Malasani Veerannasetty Radhalaxmi v. the Income Tax Officer

Karnataka HC10 Feb 2021WP/5074/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner withdrew writ petition challenging an assessment order and sought liberty to file an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The court dismissed the writ petition, reserved liberty to initiate proceedings if the scheme did not materialize, and overruled office objections.

What did the court decide?

Levity to seek restoration of the writ petition and initiate proceedings under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme if the settlement does not materialize.

Smt Malasani Veerannasetty Radhalaxmi Vs the Income Tax Officer — Income Tax | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶5

WRIT PETITION No.5074/2018 (T-IT)

¶6

BETWEEN :

¶7

Smt. Malasani Veerannasetty Radhalaxmi W/o Mr. Veerannasetty, Aged about 52 years, Residing at: Laxminivasa, New Santhe Maidana, Chitradurga 577 501. … Petitioner

¶8

(By Sri Harish V.S., Advocate)

¶9

AND :

¶10

The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2, Tamatkal Road, Medehally, Chitradurga - 577 502. … Respondent

¶11

This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned assessment order passed by the respondent U/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 29.12.2017 for the assessment year 2015-16 i.e., Annexure-C and consequential demand notice issued by the respondent dated 29.12.2017 for the assessment year 2015-16 i.e., Annexure-C1.

¶12

This Writ Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court, made the following:

¶13

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Petitioner has filed a memo, which reads as follows:

¶16

"The petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above writ petition, granting leave/liberty to the petitioner to file an application for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and avail the benefit of the Scheme and further reserving liberty to seek restoration of the above writ petition at an appropriate stage, in an event the settlement under the Scheme does not materialise so as to meet the ends of justice."

¶17

In light of the said memo, petition is dismissed .

¶18

Liberty is reserved to initiate proceedings regarding the same cause of action, if settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme does not materialise.

¶19

In light of the memo filed, office objections are overruled.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

JUDGE

¶22

VP

Smt Malasani Veerannasetty Radhalaxmi v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Malasani Veerannasetty Radhalaxmi v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Joseph Thyagaraj Vs the Commissioner

Smt. Rathnamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Abdul Arif Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Malasani Linga Setty Sarala Vs the Income Tax Officer

M/S Unisys India Private Limited Vs the Principal Commissioner of Central Tax

Smt E Sunitha Vs Sri T S Ramesh