Dismissed

Mrs Pooja Agarwal v. the Income Tax Officer

Karnataka HC6 Apr 2021WP/4958/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition regarding income tax proceedings to avail benefits under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme while reserving liberty for future restoration. The court, in light of the memo, dismissed the petition as not pressed and reserved liberty to initiate proceedings if the settlement fails.

What did the court decide?

Leaved filed application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme reserving liberty to seek restoration of writ petition; petition dismissed as not pressed.

Mrs Pooja Agarwal Vs the Income Tax Officer — Income Tax | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021 BEFORE

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶5

WRIT PETITION No.4958/2021 (T-IT)

¶6

BETWEEN :

¶7

MRS. POOJA AGARWAL, W/O VISHAL AGARWAL, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.28, 4^TH CROSS, LALBAGH ROAD, K.S. GARDEN, BANGALORE - 560 027. … PETITIONER (BY SRI HARISH V.S., ADVOCATE)

¶8

AND :

¶9

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER CIRCLE - 7 (2) (2) 3^RD FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD 6^TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 56 095. … RESPONDENT

¶10

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DISPOSING OF THE OBJECTIONS FILED BY THE PETITIONER, DATED 30.12.2019, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13 I.E., ANNEXURE-D AND CONSEQUENLTY DECLARE THAT THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT U/S 148 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13, IS ILLEGAL AND BAD IN LAW AND ETC.

¶11

¶12

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Petitioner has filed a memo, which reads as follows:

¶15

"The petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above matter as not pressed since the petitioner is contemplating of settling the dispute by availing the benefit under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and hence it is humbly prayed to grant leave/liberty to the petitioner to file an application under the VSV Scheme reserving liberty to seek restoration of the above writ petition at an appropriate stage, in an event the settlement under the Scheme does not materialise so as to meet the ends of justice."

¶16

2. In light of the said memo, petition is dismissed .

¶17

Liberty is reserved to initiate proceedings regarding the same cause of action, if settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme does not materialise.

¶18

¶19

In light of the memo filed, office objections are

¶20

overruled.

¶21

Sd/JUDGE

¶22

VP

Mrs Pooja Agarwal v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs Pooja Agarwal v. the Income Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mphasis Limited Vs Iti Limited

M/S Vijaya Energy Plus Private Ltd. Vs M/S Mangalore Internet City Pvt. Ltd.

Anusha G R Vs M H Shashidhar

M/S Smile Electronics Ltd., Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Suchitra D S Vs Sri Madhusudhan B S

Nestaway Technologies Private Limited Vs Harish P C