Writ petition filed against a bank notice under Articles 226 and 227. Petitioners filed a memo stating the matter was settled by the Bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO.49325 OF 2017 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.360 9TH CROSS, M.S.RAMAIAH EXTENSION NAGASANDRA POST BENGALURU-560 073
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI VENKATESH R.BHAGAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
HAVANOOR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT – 560 057 REP.BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PRUTHVI WODEYAR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3; R-1, R-2 AND R-4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH NOTICE DATED 27.10.2017 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri Venkatesh R.Bhagat, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners has filed a memo stating that since the matter has been settled by the Bank, this petition has become infructuous.
Placing the said memo on record, this petition is
dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
LB
Smt.Sahanashree K.S.
Sri Santhosh K.S.
Smt.Jayalakshmi H.V.
Kaveri Grammeena Bank
Kaveri Grammeena Bank Havanoor Extension Branch
Sri K.N.Srinivas
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
