Writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order in a civil proceeding was dismissed as withdrawn upon filing of a withdrawal memo by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021 BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.44480 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
CHIDANANDA REDDY S/O THIMMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O BALENAHALLI VILLAGE CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577522
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI. H.K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.M.SIDDAPPA, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 30.07.2016 AT ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHALLAKERE IN O.S. NO.180/2016 ALLOWING THE APPLICATION (I.A.NO.8) UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17, CPC READ WITH SECTION 151, CPC FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
dated 01.12.2021 seeks to withdraw this petition.
dismissed as withdrawn.
NBM
Sd/JUDGE
Chidananda Reddy
T. Thimma Reddy
Vishalakshamma
R. Nataraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
