Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to quash an order of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Mandya, in an execution petition. The High Court disposed of the petition as having become infructuous.
Writ Petition disposed as infructuous. Other remedies reserved not mentioned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.4357 OF 2017 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
ELIAZEER MICHEL J, S/O LATE JAYAVEERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1732, 4TH CROSS, CHRISTIN COLONY, MANDYA – 571 401. (SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.RAJA L, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & CJM, MANDYA IN EP NO.241/2014 DATED 6.1.2016 PRODUCED ANNEXURE-E TO THE WRIT PETITION.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
ORDER
Writ Petition is disposed off as having become infructuous as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Grounds and remedies which are otherwise available in
law are reserved.
Sd/JUDGE
cbc
Eliazeer Michel J
Smt. Alice Padmavathi
Sowmya
Krishna S.Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
