On preliminary hearing, the High Court dismissed the writ petition after recording the petitioner's memo seeking to withdraw the petition under Article 226 and 227.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.4318 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN
Sri Thimmaraju S/o Daddathimmaiah, Aged about 34 years, Resident of Kalluguttarahalli Village, Agrahara Post, C.N.Durga Hobli, Koratagere Taluk, Tumakuru District-572129.
…Petitioner
(By Sri A.Vasantha Kumar, Advocate)
AND
The State of Karnataka by SHO, Koratagere Police, Koratagere Taluk, Represented by Government Pleader, High Court Building, Bengaluru City-560001.
…Respondent (By Sri B.J.Rohith, HCGP)
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 of The Constitution of India, praying to quash Annexure-B FIR CR.No.134/2019 dated 16.08.2021 and FIR registered No.158/2019 dated 17.08.2019 and it is converted into C.C.No.367/2020 and directing the respondent to acquit
2
the petitioner and its proceedings at Lower Court Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Koratagere.
This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing , this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. Memo is placed on record. Petition is dismissed accordingly.
SD/JUDGE
sd
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Thimmaraju
State of Karnataka
Sreenivas Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
