The High Court of Karnataka disposed of two writ petitions filed by K Dhananjay. The petitioner, appearing as a party-in-person, sought to withdraw both petitions. The Court recorded the withdrawal memos and disposed of the petitions accordingly.
Petitions disposed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.60 OF 2020(GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.4197 OF 2020(GM-RES)
IN W.P.NO.60/2020:
BETWEEN:
K DHANANJAY, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O LATE K. KRISHNAPPA, HOUSE 48, ITH CROSS, 12TH MAIN ROAD, RAGHAVENDRA BLOCK, SRINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 050.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K DHANANJAY, PARTY-IN PERSON) AND:
ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR KARNATAKA, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ASG))
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 23.07.2019 (ANNX-A) PASSED BY LEARNED ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR KARNATAKA IN CONSENT APPLICATION NO.12/2019 FOR THE REASON THE FINDINGS IN IMPUGNED ORDER IS MADE ON THE BASIS OF MISCONSTRUED FACTS AND GROUNDS URGED IN THE CONSENT APPLICATION IMPUGNED ORDER IS WHOLLY PERVERSE TO LAW AND JUSTICE.
2
IN W.P.NO.4197/2020:
BETWEEN:
K DHANANJAY, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O LATE K.KRISHNAN, 48, 8TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN ROAD, RAGHAVENDRA BLOCK, SRINAGAR, BENALURU-560 050. (BY SRI. K DHANANJAY, PARTY IN PERSON)
...PETITIONER
AND:
3
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE QUASI JUDICIARY IMPUGNED ORDER ANNX-C ISSUED BY THE R-5 FOR THE REASONS ANNX-C IS INVALID, PERVERSE, IMPROPRIETY AND ILLEGAL IN LAW, AS IT CARRIES WHOLLY IRRELEVANT AND EXTRANEOUS CONSIDERATIONS AND CONTENTS AND OBSERVATIONS AND FINDINGS WHICH ARE BEYOND THE NATURE AND SCOPE AND FRAMEWORK OF THE PROCEDURES AND GUIDELINES LAID-OUT FOR THE GRANT OF SANCTION U/S 197 OF THE CR.P.C.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
The petitioner, party-in-person has filed a two separate Memos in both the petitions seeking permission to withdraw the same.
Both the Memos are taken on record, accordingly, these petitions are disposed off as having been withdrawn in terms of the Memos filed.
Sd/JUDGE
Bsv
K DHANANJAY
ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR KARNATAKA
UNION OF INDIA
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
SCIENTIFIC SECRETARY INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION
KRISHNA S. DIXIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
