Dismissed
Sri Kankalapati Damodhar v. the Union Bank of India
Karnataka HCWP/412/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.412/2020 (GM RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI KANKALAPATI DAMODHAR S/O LATE K BALAKRISHNAMA NAIDU, AGE 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.6, F-02, SHRELI ENCLAVE, HIMAGIRI MEADOWS ROAD, KALENA AGRAHARA VILLAGE, BANNEGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA-560076
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.R.A.DEVANAND, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE UNION BANK OF INDIA KALKERE BRANCH, BANNERGHATTA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA-560076, BY ITS BANK MANAGER
…. RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED 07.08.2019 ISSUED IN REFERENCE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO TAKE OVER POSSESSION OF THE SECURED ASSETS WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D BY ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION IN ITS ENTIRETY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Shri.R.A.Devanand, learned advocate for the petitioner has filed a memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw the petition.
withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
NBM
SRI KANKALAPATI DAMODHAR
THE UNION BANK OF INDIA KALKERE BRANCH
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court