Dismissed

Shri Narasimhulu Thammineni v. Union of India

Karnataka HC10 Mar 2021WP/3964/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a withdrawal prayer in regard to a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking permission to file an application under Section 245C of the Income Tax Act. The petition was dismissed with liberty to revive it if the application was not accepted.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Court again if the settlement commission does not accept the application.

Shri Narasimhulu Thammineni Vs Union of India — Income Tax | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF MARCH 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.3964/2021 (T-IT)

¶7

Between:

¶8

Shri Narasimhulu Thammineni, 56 years, No.1089, Thulasi Nilaya, 19^th Cross, 6^th MainRoad, HSR layout, 7^th Sector, Bengaluru Karnataka - 560 102. … Petitioner

¶9

(By Sri Pavan Kumar, R.S.V.S., Advocate)

¶10

And:

¶11

Union of India,

¶12

Represented by the Finance Secretary, Department of Revenue,

¶13

Ministry of Finance, 3^rd Floor, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 110 001.

¶14

Income Tax Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, Mumbai, Represented by its Secretary, Samantbhai Rathod Road, Arya Nagar, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Colony, Mahalakshmi, Mumbai - 400 034.

¶15

¶16

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 1(2), Bengaluru. … Respondents

¶17

(By Sri C. Shashikantha, ASG for R1; Sri Dilip, Advocate for Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate for R2 and R3)

¶18

This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the R-2 to permit the petitioner to file an application under Section 245C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and etc.

¶19

This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing in 'B' Group this day, the Court made the following:

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo, which reads as follows:

¶22

"The advocate for the petitioner respectively submits that the main prayer of the Writ Petition was for acceptance of the application of the Petitioner by the second Respondent. After the filing of this Writ Petition and the hearing on 24.02.2021, the second respondent has accepted the application filed by the Petitioner on 25.02.2021.

¶23

In the circumstances it is prayed that the Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above Writ Petition with liberty to approach this Hon'ble High Court again, if warranted, in the interest of justice."

¶24

¶25

In light of the said memo, the petition is

¶26

dismissed. In the event, the petitioner's application is not accepted, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek for revival of the writ petition.

¶27

Sd/JUDGE

¶28

VGR

Shri Narasimhulu Thammineni v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Narasimhulu Thammineni v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Aroon Raman Vs Union of India

M/S Inabling Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Nil

M/S Tulunadu Finance and Developments Ltd. (in Liqn) Vs Nil

M/S Si Global Private Limited Vs the Nodal Officer

Atria Convergence Technologies Limited Vs Union of India

M/S at and S India Pvt. Limited Vs the Union of India