Writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India for direction to proceed with construction of a mini Vidhana Soudha. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn upon the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.3951/2020 (GM-RES-PIL)
BETWEEN
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.NISHANTH A.V., ADV.)
2
AND
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.VIJAYAKUMAR A PATIL., AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA IN SY.NO.959/B OF SINDAGI TALUK AS PROPOSED AND SANCTIONED BY THE STATE GOVERNMENT VIDE ANNEXURE-C DATED 06.03.2019 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for
withdrawal of the writ petition and the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD/JUDGE
SD/JUDGE
TL
Sri Ramachandra Mortappa Pujari
Sri Mahadevayya Gurumurtayya Hiremath
Sri Nanagouda Ganapagouda Patil
Sri Ibrahim Abbasali Nattikar
Deputy Commissioner Vijayapura District
Assistant Commissioner Vijayapura District
Satish Chandra Sharma
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
