Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner sought quashing of an impugned order. The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the petition as having become infructuous on the ground that the petitioner's term had expired.
Writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
WRIT PETITION NO.39477 OF 2016(GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI N RAJGOPAL S/O H NARASIMHAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS RESIDING AT HAROHALLI HAROHALLI VILLAGE AND POST VIJAYAPURA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 135
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI ROSHAN YADAV M.C, ADVOCATE FOR SRI SUBBA REDDY K.N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
BENGALURU – 560 008
2
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI ACHAPPA P.B AGA FOR R1 & R2, R3 & R4 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED, SRI MUNIRAJ ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.07.2016 PASSED BY R-4 AT ANNEXURE- F DIRECT THE R-3 TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONER REPRESENTATION DATED 07.07.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE – H AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
A memo dated 16.01.2021 is filed by Mr. Roshan Yadav, the learned counsel for petitioner praying to dismiss the instant writ petition as having become infructuous, which reads as under:
“The undersigned counsel for the Petitioner herein respectfully submits to this Hon’ble Court to be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above matter as the term of the petitioner has been expired as seen in Annexure-A of the above writ petition. Hence praying this Hon’ble Court to pass appropriate orders in the interest of justice and equity.”
dismissed as having become infructuous.
VK
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI N RAJGOPAL
STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF KANNADA AND CULTURE
THE PRESIDENT KANNADA SAHITHYA PARISHAD
THE PRESIDENT BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT KANNADA SAHITHYA PARISHAD
THE PRESIDENT DEVANAHALLI TALUK KANNADA SAHITHYA PARISHAD
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
