Dismissed
Smt. R. Anitha v. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCWP/38796/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.38796/2019 (BDA)
BETWEEN:
SMT. R. ANITHA W/O LATE K.N.RAJENDRA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.260 11TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 032.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI.PREMNATH T N, ADV.)
AND:
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, SANKEY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 020.
…RESPONDENTS
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE RE-CONVEYANCE DEED FOR THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY BEARING NEW NO.260, OLD NO.36, PID NO.97-1-260 FORMED IN SY.NO.21/1 OF MATTADAHALLI VILLAGE, BENGALURU NOW 11TH CROSS, 1ST BLOCK, R.T.NAGAR BENGALURU-560 032 MEASURING EAST TO WEST 30 FEET AND NORTH TO SOUTH 40 FEET IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R
No representation for the petitioner either in the morning or in the afternoon.
The writ petition is filed 21.08.2019. Even after sufficient opportunity, the petitioner has failed to comply with the office objections. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE
CT:bms
mpk/ -*
Smt. R. Anitha
The State of Karnataka
S.G.Pandit
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court