Disposed

M/S Woodwell International v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC25 Aug 2021WP/3850/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash communications regarding forest matters, staying precipitative action pending an expert committee's decision.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; liberty reserved to file application before State Level Expert Committee; no precipitative action till Committee takes decision; no costs.

M/S Woodwell International Vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.3850 OF 2020 (GM-FOR)

¶7

BETWEEN :

¶8

M/S. WOODWELL INTERNATIONAL A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM NO.13/A, BELAVADI INDUSTRIAL AREA MYSURU-570 018 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER

¶9

SRI. JAYAPRAKASH M.N

¶10

SRI. M.N. JAYAPRAKASH S/O LATE M.N. NANAIAH AGED 60 YEARS R/AT NO.29, 5^TH MAIN ROAD 3^RD BLOCK, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM MYSURU - 570001

¶11

SRI. M.N. PREMKUMAR S/O LATE M.N. NANAIAH AGED 57 YEARS R/AT NO.29, 5^TH MAIN ROAD 3^RD BLOCK, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM MYSURU-570 001

¶12

REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SRI. M.N. JAYAPRAKASH S/O LATE SRI. M.N. NANAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO.29, 5^TH MAIN ROAD

¶13

¶14

3^RD BLOCK, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM MYSURU-570 001 …PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SHRI. N. VINAY FOR

¶16

SHRI. P.N. MANMOHAN, ADVOCATES)

¶17

[THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE]

¶18

AND :

¶19

STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF FOREST M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY

¶20

ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL CHIEF FOREST CONSERVATOR FOREST BHAVAN MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560 020

¶21

DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST MYSORE DIVISION MYSURU-5700 01 ... RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP)

¶23

. . . .

¶24

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMMUNICATION DATED 19.01.2017 ISSUED BY R-2 (PRODUCED AS ANNX-M) AND QUASH THE ENDORSEMENTS DATED 17.06.2017 AND 30.01.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-3 (PRODUCED AS ANNX-P AND R RESPECTIVELY) AND ETC.

¶25

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶26

¶27

ORDER

¶28

Learned Advocate for petitioner submitted that this petition may be disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioner to file an application before the State Level Expert Committee within a period of four weeks from today.

¶29

Smt. Rashmi Patel, learned HCGP submitted that

¶30

if such an application is filed by the petitioner, the same will be considered within an outer limit of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the application.

¶31

In the circumstance, this writ petition is

¶32

disposed of, placing the submission of learned HCGP on record.

¶33

There shall be no precipitative action till the State

¶34

Level Expert Committee takes decision in the matter.

¶35

No costs.

¶36

Sd/JUDGE

¶37

SPS

M/S Woodwell International v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Woodwell International v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Manjunath C H Vs the Union of India

Sri. M. B. Vishwanath Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri D M Manchegowda Vs the State of Karnataka

A Lakshmamma Vs N Shivanna

Lokesh Vs Smt. G.S. Sudha

M/S S L v Associates Vs the State of Karnataka