The High Court of Karnataka, in Writ Petition No. 3786/2020 filed by M/S Sainandana Developers challenging municipal construction procedures, dismissed the petition because the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the application before it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO.3786/2020 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN
M/S SAINANDANA DEVELOPERS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, T. NEERAJAKSHULU, NO.251, II FLOOR, 9TH MAIN, 43RD CROSS, FIFTH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 041
... PETITIONER
[BY SRI B. PRAMOD, ADVOCATE]
AND
2
….RESPONDENTS
[BY SMT. SARITHA KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 SRI AMRUTHESH N.P., ADVOCATE FOR R4]
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO INITIATE REQUISITE PROCEEDINGS AS PROVIDED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT, 1986 R/W BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BUILDINGS BYE-LAWS, 2003 TO ENSURE THAT THE CONSTRUCTION CARRIED OUT ON THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SAID PROVISIONS ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.
Memo is taken on record. Writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn .
Sd/JUDGE
GH
M/S Sainandana Developers
Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
The Chief Engineer
The Asst. Executive Engineer
Md. Meraj Ui Haq Taqul
M. Nagapranna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
