The High Court of Karnataka heard a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging a sale notice under the SARFAESI Act. The court did not determine the merit but dismissed the petition as voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioners without costs.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.3711 OF 2021 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN :
R.T.NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 032
(BY SMT. S .K. PRATHIMA, ADVOCATE)
AND :
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER HDFC BANK LTD. OFFICE SITUATED AT GOLDEN TOWERS 3RD FLOOR, NEXT TO GOLDEN ENCLAVE KODIHALLI, OLD AIRPORT ROAD BANGALORE-560 017 …RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET THE NOTICE OF PROCLAMATION OF SALE DATED 25.02.2012 UNDER RULE 8(6) OF THE SECURITY INTEREST
2
(ENFORCEMENT RULES), 2002 UNDER SARFAESI ACT, 2002 (ANNEXURE-G) AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Smt.S.K.Prathima, learned advocate for the petitioners has filed a memo of even date seeking leave to withdraw this petition.
2. Memo be kept in record. Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
No costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
AV
3 provisions across 3 enactments
MR. NARESH VITTAL RAO PISE AND ANR
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER HDFC BANK LTD
P.S. DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
