Sln Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. the Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
WRIT PETITION No.34960/2018 (T-RES)
Between:
SLN Technologies Pvt. Ltd., “Horizon”, 3rd Floor, No.1, Pai Layout, Old Madras Road, Bengaluru – 560 016. (Represented by its Managing Director, Sri.D.R.Subramanyam, Aged about 56 years, S/o Sri.Devalokam Ramakrishnaiah).
… Petitioner
(By Sri.Sharath S., Advocate)
And:
The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, Technology Bhavan, New Mehrauli Road, New Delhi – 110 016.
… Respondent
(By Sri.H.Jayakara Shetty, Advocate)
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash as far as the
2
petitioners are concerned impugned endorsement vide letter dated 13.11.2017 passed by the respondent rejecting the approval of in-house R&D facility of the petitioner under Section 35(2ab) of Income-Tax Act, 1961 read with Proviso to Rule 6(5A) enclosed in Annexure – A and etc.,
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
he intends to avail the benefit of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and his application filed under the said scheme has been accepted.
In light of the memo filed and submission made,
the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NS
SLN Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
The Union of India
S. Sunil Dutt Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court