The Karnataka High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.33978 of 2019 as infructuous after accepting a memo filed by the petitioner's counsel stating that the matter was no longer subsisting.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.33978 OF 2019 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
Kum. Nagalakshmi Bai D/o K.C.Giriya Naik Aged about 55 years Chair Person: Karnataka State Women Commission No.107, Kaveri Bhavan 1st Floor, KHB Building K.G.Road, Bengaluru-560 009.
... Petitioner
(By Sri.K.N.Nithesh, Advocate)
AND:
(By Sri. S.R.Kamalacharan, AGA)
... Respondents
2
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the orders dtd. 29.07.2019 as per Annexure-D and dtd. 29.07.2019 as per Annexure-E and etc.
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Sri. K.N.Nitesh, learned counsel for petitioner
submits that the above matter has become infructuous.
Accepting the said memo, the writ petition is
dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
SSD
Kum. Nagalakshmi Bai D/o K.C.Giriya Naik
The State of Karnataka
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
