Dismissed
Lalithamma v. the State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCWP/3092/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.3092 OF 2020 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN
2
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO 0157/1
W/O LATE HANUMAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, MEMBERSHIP NO 0185/1
3
4
5
6
ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE THE MEMBERS OF HALASURU WATER USERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., HALASURU, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DIST, PIN CODE-577144.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI PRAKASHA H C, ADV.)
AND
7
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M.VINOD KUMAR, AGA FOR R1,R3 TO R5, SRI G.V.SHASHIKUMAR, ADV. FOR R2.)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION 20(2)(a-iv)(a-v) THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT,1959 IS ULTRA VIRES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA ETC.
THIS WP COMING ON FOR ‘ORDERS’ THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
8
ORDER
Heard Shri Prakash H.C., learned advocate for the petitioners, Sri. M.Vinod Kumar, learned AGA for the State and Shri G.V.Shashi Kumar, learned advocate for respondent No.2.
infructuous.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
Rsk/CT-HR
LALITHAMMA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court