Non-prosecuted writ petition challenging an order under the SARFAESI Act directing possession of schedule property. The petition was dismissed due to abandonment as no one appeared for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 2941 OF 2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN :
SMT. PAVITHRA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS D/O MUNIRAJ NO.314, 1ST FLOOR 1ST CROSS, KALYAN NAGAR T.DASARAHALLI BENGALURU-560 057 …PETITIONER
(BY SMT.D.KAVITHA, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND :
STATE BANK OF INDIA PARAMOUNT LAYOUT BRANCH B.H.ROAD, NELAMANGALA-562 123 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER SRI HARIDASAN M.M. ... RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31.12.2018 IN CRL.MISC NO.5246/2018 PASSED BY THE XLV ADDL. METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
ORDER
None appears for the petitioner.
dismissed for non-prosecution.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
AV
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit the writ petition challenging an order directing possession of schedule property under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Pavithra
State Bank of India Paramount Layout Branch
P.S. Dinesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
