Dismissed

Ajith K v. Bangalore University

Karnataka HC25 Oct 2021WP/2777/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A single bench of the Karnataka High Court dismissed writ petitions filed by students seeking marks cards from Bangalore University and GKM College. Relying on a Division Bench order that found the college lacked affiliation and committed fraud, the court held there were no grounds to entertain the petitions.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions dismissed; no relief granted to petitioners.

Ajith K Vs Bangalore University — Education and Admissions | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.2790 OF 2020 (EDN-EX) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.2777 OF 2020

¶6

IN W.P.2790/2020

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

AMINA KHATOON D/O GUFRAN ULLAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶9

ANANDINI CHAND D/O ARTA BHANJAN CHAND AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶10

ANITHA KUMARI D.M. D/O MUNIYAPPA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶11

ANKHI PURKAIT D/O ARUN KUMAR PURKAI T AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶12

APARNA SRIVASTAVA D/O DIVESH PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶13

¶14

ARUNA R D/O M RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶15

ASHA DEVADAS D/O DEVADASAN AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶16

ASHA NINAN D/O K T NINAN AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶17

BANGERA DEEKSHA JINARAJA D/O JINARIJ JARAPPA BANGERERA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶18

BHAGYALAKSHMI BIRADAR D/O BAPU RAO BIRADAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

¶19

BHAVYA SHREE H.G. D/O Y R GANGADHAR AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶20

CHAITRASHREE C D/O CHANDRAPPA S T AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶21

CHARUSHREE A.M. D/O MALANNA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶22

CHINMAYEE SWAIN D/O RABINDRA NATH SWAIN AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶23

DIVYA PRABHA T

¶24

S/O SANATH KUMAR T AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶25

¶26

ESTHER ANITA M.G. D/O GREGORY M AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶27

GAGNA GANGADHAR D/O BS GANGADHAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶28

GARGI NANDI D/O ASHIM KUMAR NANDI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶29

GAYATHRI.M D/O MOHAN R AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶30

HELENA ROSALIND SIMENTO D/O THEODORE ANTHONY SIMENTO AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶31

IPSITA TRIPATHY D/O KRUSHNA CHANDRA TRIPATHY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶32

JISHA P.V. D/O BALAKRISHNAN V.E. AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶33

KAVITHA D D/O DRAVIDAMANI P AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

¶34

KIRAN AGARWAL D/O V.K. AGARWAL AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶35

KUMARI S D/O SATHYAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶36

¶37

KUMARI SWETA D/O SHAMBHU SARAN SINGH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶38

LAKSHMINARAYANA S S/O SHIVAIAH P AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶39

LATHA D D/O DHANAPALAN R AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶40

LEELAVATHI G.R. D/O RAMESHA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶41

LORALIN RATH D/O SURENDRA KUMAR RATH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶42

MADHUSOODANA S S/O BALAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶43

MAMATHA S D/O SHIVARAMAIAH K.M. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

¶44

MANJULA KUMARI D/O TARKESHWAR PRASAD MALL AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶45

MARIA LEONA J SIMON D/O R J SIMON AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶46

¶47

MARIA SPOORTHI S D/O SELVARAJ J AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶48

MARY BINDU C D/O CHELLAPPA A AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶49

MEERA P D/O UNNIKRISHNAN P AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

¶50

MEGHANA D.M. D/O MOHAN D.S AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

¶51

MELKUNDI ARCHANA D/O BABURAO KULAKARNI AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

¶52

MOUMITA NATH D/O PANKAJ NATH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶53

MUEINA R D/O ABDUL RAHIM AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶54

NAIR ARCHANA R D/O RAVINDRAN AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶55

NATASHA MIRIAM D/O MOHAN AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶56

NEHA BHARTI D/O RAM NARESH SINGH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶57

¶58

NEHA SHARDANADAN D/O SANJAYA SHARMA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

¶59

NIKI PODDAR D/O PAWAN KUMAR PODDAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

¶60

NIRMALA D/O VENKAPPA NAIKA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶61

NIRMALA JAAMDAR D/O VIRUPAXAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

¶62

NIVEDA MANJUNATH D/O K S MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

¶63

NIVEDITHA D/O BHAVANI SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶64

PADMA S D/O G SUNDAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶65

PADMAPRIYA K D/O K R VIVEKANANDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

¶66

PAVANAKSHI D/O PADMANABHA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

¶67

PREEMA MATHEW D/O MATHEW K J AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶68

¶69

PREETHI P D/O PATALAPPA

¶70

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶71

PREETI BALA SAHU D/O SHYAM SUNDAR SAHU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶72

PREETI SARKAR D/O JIBAN KRISHNAN SARKAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶73

RADHA N D/O V NATRARAJAN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

¶74

RANGANATH R S/O RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶75

RANI V THOMAS D/O V A THOMAS AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶76

RASHMI SINGH D/O CHANSHYA SINGH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶77

RENU BALA D/O ABHI RAM SINGH AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

¶78

RICHA JAIN D/O A P JAIN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶79

RITWIKA DEV D/O NANDA DEV AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

¶80

¶81

ROSELINE MARY S D/O SUSAI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶82

SALMA SULTHANA D/O FAYAZ AHAMED K.M. AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶83

SARANI LAHA D/O GOPAL CH LAHA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶84

SAYERABANU D/O R ADAM SAB AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶85

SELVI D D/O R DANDAYUDHA PANI AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶86

SHAINY MOHAN V D/O SHAINY MOHAN V AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶87

SHALINI G D/O SHALINI G AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶88

SHANDRA PORWAL D/O SHYAM BABU GUPTA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶89

SHARADAMMA H D/O HANUMANTHAPPA K.E. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

¶90

SHILPA B D/O BISHNI PANDEY AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶91

¶92

SHINCY U J D/O JOSEPH U V AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶93

SHIRLEY PRIYA S D/O SILVESTES A AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

¶94

SHIVA KUMAR B P S/O PARAMESHWARAPPA S AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

¶95

SHREELATHA B B D/O BALAKRISHNA GOWDA B B AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶96

SHVETA MORAY K D/O KRISHNAJI RAO R AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

¶97

SHWETA NAYAK D/O VINAYAKA NAYAK AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶98

SHWETA THIRUMENI D/O VS THIRUMENI AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶99

SHWETHA S D/O SHIVAGANGACHAR AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶100

SHWETHA SUNNY D/O SUNNY ABRAHAM AGDA ABOUT 28 YEARS

¶101

SOPHIA SHARON M D/O C MUTHU AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶102

¶103

SOUMI ANNIE JOB D/O ANTONY JOB AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶104

SOUMI DAS D/O MANORANJAN DAS AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶105

SOWMYA B R D/O RUDRAPPA T AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶106

SREELA MENON P D/O V RAJENDRA BABU AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶107

SRINIVASULU C S/O CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶108

SUDIPTA MONDAL D/O SUKUMAR MONDAL AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

¶109

SUJATHA T C D/O CHIDAMBARAIAH T.K. AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

¶110

SUMA H D/O HANIMANTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶111

SUMAN KIRAN D/O SIDH NATH SHARMA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶112

SUMANGALA N D/O NARAYANA REDDY G AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

¶113

¶114

UMA UNNIKRISHNAN D/O UNNIKRISHNAN AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶115

VERONICA D/O PAPACHAN AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

¶116

VISHAKA K D/O RUKMAYA NAIK AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶117

VYSHALI H V D/O VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶118

ALL ARE STUDYING AT: GKM COLLEGE GKM EDUCATION INSTITUTION TRUST (R) 23/2, 23/5, GKM, COLLEGE ROAD J.P. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 078.

¶119

….PETITIONERS

¶120

(BY SRI. AMAN N.L., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. D. R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE)

¶121

AND:

¶122

BANGALORE UNIVERSITY JNANA BHARATHI JNANA BHARATHI CAMPUS BENGALURU – 560 056 REPT. BY ITS REGISTRAR

¶123

ST. STEPHENS TEACHER COLLEGE No. 69/1, 69/2, MARAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE SULIKERE POST, KENGARI HOBLI BENGALURU – 60 REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

¶124

¶125

... RESPONDENTS

¶126

(BY SRI. D. ASWATHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 SRI. NAVEEN GUDIKOTE. S, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

¶127

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING TO ISSUE MARKS CARDS/CERTIFICATES TO PETITIONERS WHO HAVE UNDERTAKEN 1^st AND 2^nd SEMESTER EXAMS (BACHELOR OF EDUCATION) AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17.01.2020 BY RESPONDENT No.1- BANGALORE UNIVERSITY AT ANNEXURE-E.

¶128

IN W.P.2777/2020

¶129

BETWEEN:

¶130

AJITH K

¶131

S/O KANNIYAPPA K.C. AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶132

AKSHATHA S BHARADWAJ D/O SRIDHAR MURTHY S.A. AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶133

AKSHAYA S D/O SATHISH CHANDRAN K AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶134

¶135

AMRUTHA B.L. D/O D LAKSHMINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶136

AMURUTHA B D D/O DARMENDAR B.P. AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶137

ANANYA DD D/O DEVENDRAPPA N M AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶138

ANJANAMURTHY K. S S/O SOMASHEKAR AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶139

ANUPAMA SURANGE D/O ULHAS SHAMRAD SURANGE AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶140

ANURADHA SHARMA D/O YOGESH KUMAR SHARMA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶141

ARUNA N D/O NANJAPPA N AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶142

ASHWINI M D/O MUDDUMADDAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶143

ASWATHY V. D/O PRABHAKARAN N AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶144

BHARTHKUMAR M S/O MARAPPA V AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶145

¶146

BRITO AMALAN V D/O VEDAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶147

DHANA PRIYA D/O PALANIVEL AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶148

DIANA KONNUR D/O VISHNU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶149

HARIKA J D/O JAYARAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶150

HARISHA D.K. D/O DIWAKARA S.K. AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶151

HARSHITHA R D/O RAMESH R AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶152

HAVLE MAYURI RAMAPPA D/O RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶153

HANJESH KUMAR K.M. D/O MARANNA K AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

¶154

INDUMATHI A D/O ARUNACHALAM AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶155

IRAM MASOOD S/O ARSHAD MASOOD AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶156

¶157

JAJNASENI SABUT D/O SABUT JAJNASENI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶158

JINCY V.M. D/O MATHEW AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶159

JOSPHINE M D/O MATHU K.P. AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS

¶160

KOLHE KAVITA BALASAHEB D/O BALASHEB AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶161

KOUSHIK S S/O SUBRAMANYA S R AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶162

KRITHIKA M D/O MOHAN S AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶163

KUMAR S M S/O MANJAPPA S AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶164

LAKSHMI BHARGAVI BANDLA D/O VENKATESWAR RAO BANDLA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶165

LAXMI DEVI S/O CHINNAYYA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶166

MA RADHIKA D/O RAMACHANDRA MURTHY M AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶167

¶168

MADEVI M D/O MUNIRAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶169

MADHURI A V D/O A S VIJAYANARASIMHA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶170

MADHURI B C D/O CHENNAGOWDA B C AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶171

MARIA SAMPTH KUMARI B D/O I M BENEDICT AGED ABUT 38 YEARS

¶172

MARY CHRISTINA D/O AROKIA NICHOLAS M AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

¶173

MARY LEONEY NICHOLAS D/O AROKIA NICHOLAS M AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶174

MEGHANA C.S. D/O SRINIVAS C AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶175

NEHA KHANDIGE D/O GOPALA KRISHNAN KHANDIGE AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶176

NIDA MASOOD D/O A MASOOD AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

¶177

NISHA KHANDIGE D/O GOPALA KRISHNAN KHANDIGE AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶178

¶179

NISHA S D/O SRINIVASAN S AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶180

PAVITHRA V D/O VENKATESH MURTHY AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶181

POOJA S D/O SATISH UPAHYA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶182

PREETHI D D/O DENNIS PAUL AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶183

PREETHY S D/O T.T. SESHADRI AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶184

PREETI KUMARI D/O RAMESH PANDEY AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶185

PRIYANKA BAJPAI D/O RAM MOHAN BAJPAI AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶186

PRIYANKA KUMARI D/O BANWARI SHARMA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶187

PUNAM JHA D/O SHYAMAL SHIVAM AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS

¶188

PUSHPA B D/O MARI SWAMY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

¶189

¶190

PUSHPAKUMARI R D/O RAJARATHNAM AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

¶191

RADHIKA MADHAV WARRIER D/O MADHAV AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS

¶192

RAIPEDDA CHANDRIKA D/O RAIPEDDA VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶193

RAMYA N D/O N NETHAJI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

¶194

RASHEEDA BEGUM D/O GHOUSE MOHIYUDDIN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶195

RAVISHANKAR HEGDE S/O SHAMBULINGA HEGDE AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶196

RENEE ELISHA GUNDIMI D/O ELISHA S GUNDIMI AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶197

REVATHI J D/O S JEGANNATHAN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

¶198

REVATHI R.K. D/O RAMAKRISHNA KRUPA B AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶199

ROSELENE LALITHA D/O SAMUEL G AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶200

¶201

SAGARIKA MITRA D/O SHISHIK MUMAR MITRA AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶202

SANGEETHA JEFFREY D/O JEFFREY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

¶203

SANKHASUBHRA BANERJEE S/O SIBAPRASAD BANERJEE AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶204

SAPNA D D/O DATTATHRI A G AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS

¶205

SARA JOHN D/O GEORGE JOHN AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

¶206

SAVITHA B D/O BASAVARAJ B AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶207

SAYA BISHT D/O BALWANT SINGH BISHT AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶208

SEETHA D V D/O VENKATACHALAPATHY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

¶209

SHAILAJA D/O PUTTARAJ S AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

¶210

SHAMSIYA TABASSUM D/O MUNAWAR AHMED AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

¶211

¶212

SHRIDEVI RAYAGONDA D/O BASAVARAJ AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶213

SIDDARAM REDDY D/O BASANAGOUDA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

¶214

SIKHA BAIRAGI D/O B C BAIRAGI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶215

SINDHU S D/O SUNDARA MURTHY J AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS

¶216

SOUMYA NARAYANAN S/O K S NARAYANAN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS

¶217

SUNITHA SHARMA D/O RAJKUMAR SHARMA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

¶218

SURYA RAPHAEL D/O E V RAPHEL AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

¶219

SUSHMA S D/O SRIDHARA S AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

¶220

USMITA BHATTACHARJEE D/O PRANAB BATTACHARJEE AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶221

TEJASHWINI C.K. D/O KODHANDARAJU C AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS

¶222

¶223

THUSHRA MARIAM THOMAS D/O THOMAS PP AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

¶224

TONY LUKOSE D/O T.L. LUKOSE AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS

¶225

USHA S D/O SUNDARAMURTHY R AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶226

VANDANA G.B. D/O BOREGOWDA B AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

¶227

VANI SHARMA D/O RAJIV KUMAR SHARMA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS

¶228

VANITHA D D/O DAMODHARAN N. AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS

¶229

VINDHYA RAO D/O VENKATA SUBBA RAO H R AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶230

ALL ARE STUDYING AT GKM COLLEGE GKM EDUCATION INSTITUTION TRUST (R) 23/2, 23/5, GKM COLLEGE ROAD J.P. NAGAR POST BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU – 560 078.

¶231

….PETITIONERS

¶232

(BY SRI. AMAN N.L., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. D. R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE)

¶233

¶234

AND:

¶235

BANGALORE UNIVERSITY JNANA BHARATHI JNANA BHARATHI CAMPUS BENGALURU – 560 056 REPT. BY ITS REGISTRAR

¶236

GKM COLLEGE GKM EDUCATION INSTITUTION TRUST (R) 23/2, 23/5, GKM COLLEGE ROAD J.P. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU – 560 078 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶237

... RESPONDENTS

¶238

(BY SRI. D. ASWATHAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 SRI. NAVEEN GUDIKOTE. S, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

¶239

¶240

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO ISSUE MARKS CARDS/CERTIFICATES TO PETITIONERS WHO HAVE UNDERTAKEN 1 AND 2 SEMESTER B.Ed. EXAMS AND ALTERNATIVE, R-1 BANGALAORE UNIVERSITY TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17.01.2020 AT ANNEXURE-E.

¶241

THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶242

¶243

O R D E R

¶244

The petitioners have filed these writ

¶245

petitions seeking for a mandamus directing respondent No.1 to issue marks cards/certificates to the petitioners who have undertaken 1^st and 2^nd semester B.Ed. Examinations or in the alternative to issue direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation dated 17.1.2020 vide Annexure-E.

¶246

Brief facts leading to filing of these petitions are as under:

¶247

The petitioners were admitted for B.Ed. course which is of two years consisting of four semesters. Admission of the petitioners was approved by respondent No.1-University and they were permitted to take 1^st semester exam held during the month of April 2019. However,

¶248

¶249

due to some misconception between the NCTE and the college, respondent No.1-University is withholding grant of affiliation to respondent No.2-Institution. Respondent No.1 had sought to withdraw renewal of affiliation for the academic year 2018-19 and also withheld the results of the petitioners of the 1^st semester B.Ed. exams for the academic year 2018-19. However, the petitioners were permitted to take 1^st and 2^nd semester examinations conducted by respondent No.1-University and that results have been withheld by the University and marks card/certificates have not yet been issued. Hence, these writ petitions.

¶250

Heard learned counsel for petitioners

¶251

and also learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2.

¶252

¶253

Respondent No.2-Insitution has filed a

¶254

writ petition in W.P.No.30208/2019 before this Court. This Court vide order dated 30.11.2020 dismissed the writ petition filed by respondent No.2. The petitioners herein have also sought for

¶255

an interim order in the instant writ petitions. This Court vide order dated 20.2.2020 and 28.9.2020 rejected the interim prayer sought for

¶256

by the petitioners. The petitioners aggrieved by the order passed by this Court on 28.9.2020 preferred writ appeal in W.A.No.494/2020 c/w other appeals. The Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 6.3.2021 dismissed the writ appeals. While dismissing the writ appeals, the Division Bench of this Court has recorded a finding which reads as under :

¶257

“11. The students shall be certainly free to take appropriate steps

¶258

¶259

for grant of compensation as their precious time has been wasted on account of the fraud played by the Institute by projecting itself as affiliated with the Bangalore University.

¶260

12. In the present case, as the Institute has not been recognized nor affiliated to the University and therefore the University is certainly not at all under an obligation to issue any marks sheet or to conduct any examination. The University is also not under an obligation in issuing any Degree specially in the light of the fact that the Institute is not affiliated to the University at all.

¶261

13. Learned counsel for the University has also informed this Court that in the Township of Bengaluru and also in other places in the State of Karnataka which are under the jurisdiction of the Bangalore University,

¶262

¶263

large number of colleges are admitting the students without there being recognition by the expert bodies and without there being affiliation from the Bengaluru University or any other University constituted under the Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000. He has stated that so called educational institutions are playing with the future of young children and therefore, liberty be granted to the University to lodge FIR against all such Institutes who are admitting students without there being any affiliation and without there being any recognition from the University.

¶264

14. In the considered opinion of this Court, the prayer made by the learned counsel is genuine and reasonable prayer and therefore, in the larger public interest, the University shall be free to lodge FIR in respect of all such Institutes which are admitting the students without there being affiliation

¶265

¶266

and without there being any recognition.

¶267

15. Writ petition No.s2790/2020 and 2777/2020 be sent back to the concerned Court for passing orders in accordance with law.

¶268

16. In terms of the order passed in W.A.No.167/2020, the connected writ appeals i.e., WA Nos.495/2020 and 494/2020 stand dismissed.

¶269

No orders as to costs.

¶270

Pending IAs., if any, stand disposed of.

¶271

From a perusal of the aforesaid order, it is seen that the Division Bench has observed that respondent No.2 has admitted the students without there being an affiliation and further liberty was reserved to respondent No.1 to lodge an FIR against respondent No.2 and has also

¶272

¶273

recorded a finding that the petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate steps for grant of compensation as their precious time has been wasted on account of the fraud played by respondent No.2 by projecting itself as affiliated with the Bengaluru University.

¶274

In view of the aforesaid observation, I do

¶275

not find any grounds to entertain the writ petitions. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed.

¶276

In view of the disposal of the writ petitions,

¶277

IA No.2/2020 does not survive for consideration.

¶278

SD/JUDGE

¶279

Ajith K v. Bangalore University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajith K v. Bangalore University

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri P Gopal Reddy Vs Smt Muniyamma

Hanumantharaju D R Vs the State of Karnataka

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt Rekha Jayaram

Amina Khatoon Vs Bangalore University

Sri. S Venkatesh Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. N Laxminarayan Vs State of Karnataka