The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 as not pressed, following the petitioner's counsel filing a memo to withdraw the petition.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION No.2557/2020 (LB - RES)
BETWEEN
SMT.GOWRAMMA, W/O SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.14/1, 6TH CROSS, ISEC MAIN ROAD, NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU - 560 072.
... PETITIONER
[BY SRI.G.SHANKAR, ADVOCATE (VIDEO CONFERENCING)]
AND
2
SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU - 562 111.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-3 TO DEMARCATE/FIX THE BOUNDARY OF THE PANCHAYATH LAND, ROAD, GOVERNMENT LAND AND THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS PER THE GOVERNMENT RECORDS PROPERLY AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a
memo seeking to dismiss the writ petition as not
pressed.
3
Memo is taken on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
SJK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Gowramma
State of Karnataka
The Tahsildar, Nelamangala Taluk
The Panchayath Development Officer
Smt. Parvathamma
M. Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
