Zia Ahmed v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking mandamus against illegal construction on his land. The Court held that pending status quo order in the related appeal makes the current petition unnecessary, disposing it without keeping it pending.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 24866 OF 2017 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
ZIA AHMED, S/O LATE MAHMOOD SAB, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/AT BHARATI STREET, SRINGERI TOWN, CHICKMAGALURU DISTRICT -577 139. SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KEMPANNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 011.
- THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, REVENUE SUB DIVISION, CHICKMAGALURU DISTRICT, CHICKMAGALURU.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition needs to be kept pending considering the status quo order in the review petition regarding land acquisition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ZIA AHMED
- respondent
STATE OF KARNATAKA
- respondent
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, REVENUE SUB DIVISION, CHICKMAGALURU DISTRICT
- respondent
TOWN PANCHAYAT, SRINGERI
- respondent
THE VIDYARANYAPURA GRAM PANCHAYAT
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/24866/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court