Sri. S. Nagaraju v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
This disposition dismisses a writ petition challenging the constitutionality of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016, on the grounds that the Supreme Court has already stayed the interim relief subsequent to the High Court's prior judgment upholding the rules.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.2472/2021 (GM-MM-S)
BETWEEN
SRI. S.NAGARAJU, S/O LATE R.SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, JYOTHIGOWDANAPURA VILLAGE, CHANDAKAVADI VILLAGE, CHANDAKAVADI HOBLI, CHAMARAJANAGAR TALUK AND DISTRICT.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.ANIRUDH ANAND, ADVOCATE)
AND
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court can declare the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016 unconstitutional after the High Court upheld their validity in W.P. No.53084/2016 on 01st June 2020.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri. S.Nagaraju
- respondent
State of Karnataka
- respondent
The Commissioner and Director, Department of Mines and Geology
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/2472/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court