Writ petition challenging cooperative election laws was dismissed as infructuous since elections had already been conducted.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. S. DINESH KUMAR
W.P. NO.2340 OF 2019 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN :
D.K.DISTRICT - 574 239. MEMBERS OF SULLIA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL SANGHA (N) SULLIA TALUK, D.K. - 574 239.
BOTH ARE MEMBERS OF SULLIA CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL SANGHA (N) SULLIA TALUK, D.K. - 574 239.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI KRISHNA MOORTHY D, ADVOCATE)
AND :
2
M S BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
4 . THE RETURNING OFFICER SULLIA PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD SULLIA TALUK, D.K. - 574 239.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, A.G.A. R1, R4 & R5; SRI G.V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADVOCATE. FOR R2; R3-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION 20(2) (a-iv) (a-v) THE KARNATAKA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT IS ULTRA VIRUS THE LEGISLATIVE COMPETENCE AND ARTICLE 243Z1 AND 243ZO OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Heard Shri. Krishnamoorthy D., learned Advocate for the petitioner, Smt. Niloufer Akbar, learned AGA for the State and Shri.G.V.Shashi Kumar, learned advocate for respondent No.2.
3. In the circumstances, Petition is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
hnm
K Gokul Das
Sudheer Rai M
The State of Karnataka
Co-operative Election Authority
Sullia Primary Agricultural Credit Co-operative Society Ltd
The Returning Officer
P. S. Dinesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
