Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. During the preliminary hearing, the petitioner applied to withdraw the petition. The Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.21794 OF 2021(GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SHRIDHAR PRABHU, S/O LATE G H PRABHU, AGED 44 YEARS, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.205, II FLOOR, TRIGUNA ICON, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, WILSON GARDEN, BENGALURU – 560 027. (PARTY IN PERSON) (BY SRI. SIDDAVEER C, ADVOCATE)
...PETITIONER
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. VAISHALI HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNX-A AND CONSEQUENTLY, BE PLEASED TO ISSUE A AND ETC.,
2
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Petitioner, party in person seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw the petition. There is no objection from the
other side.
Placing submission of the petitioner party in person on record, this petition is disposed off as having been
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Bsv
Shridhar Prabhu
Advocates Association Bengaluru
The High Power Committee
Krishna S.Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
