Disposed

M.K. Industries v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC7 Jun 2021WP/207251/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by three industrial units challenging orders of the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board. The petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted by the High Court of Karnataka, disposing of the matter as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition granted; the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

M.K. Industries Vs the Deputy Commissioner — Environment and Pollution | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 207251 OF 2020 (GM-POLLUTION )

¶9

BETWEEN :

¶10

M.K.INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SRI MD.MUNNASAHA S/O MD.LATEEFSAHA AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: PROPRIETOR R/O PLOT NO.113, P-1, 113 P-2 KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA HUMNABAD, NEAR SAI TALKIES N.H. 9, HUMNABAD DIST. BIDAR-585 330.

¶11

K.G.N. INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SAHARA BEGUM W/O MD. KHAJASAHA AGED 42 YEARS, OCC: PROPRIETOR R/O PLOT NO.100, P-1 PART KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA HUMNABAD DIST. BIDAR-585 330.

¶12

PIONEER INDUSTRIES THROUGH ITS PARTNER SRI MD.KHASAHA S/O LATEEDAHA, AGED 46 YEARS OCC: PARTNER, R/O PLOT NO.80

¶13

¶14

KIADB, INDUSTRIAL AREA HUMNABAD DIST. BIDAR-585 330.

¶15

… PETITIONERS (BY SHRI SHAMBULING S.SALEMATH, ADVOCATE)

¶16

AND:

¶17

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BIDAR, BIDAR-585 401. 2. THE KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD THROUGH ITS MEMBER SECRETARY PARASARA BHAVAN, 1 TO 5^TH FLOOR NO.49, CHURCH STREET BENGALURU-560 001. 3. THE ZONAL OFFICE KARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD FLAT NO.G-101, GREEN PARK HOUSING BOARD COLONY RING ROAD, SHAIKROZA, KALABURAGI-585 102. 4. THE GULBARGA ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. LTD., THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR STATION ROAD, KALABURAGI-585 102. … RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI VIJAYAKUMAR A.PATIL, AGA FOR R-1; SHRI A.MAHESH CHOUDHARY, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 AND R-3; SHRI GOURISH S.KHASHAMPUR, ADVOCATE FOR R-3; SHRI P.S.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R-4)

¶18

¶19

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS DATED 24.12.2019 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 AGAINST THE PETITIONER NOs.1 TO 3

¶20

¶21

HEREIN WHICH ARE AT ANNEXURES- K, K-1 AND K-2, AND ETC.

¶22

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, states that in view of the subsequent developments, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

¶25

2. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶26

Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE

¶27

Sd/JUDGE

¶28

vgh*

M.K. Industries v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.K. Industries v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Professional Global Constructions Private Limited Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri D v Venkataramaiah Vs Sri. P. Nagaprashanth

K N Venugopal Vs Smt Srilakshmi

M/S Sana Industries Vs the Deputy Commissioner

The Karnataka State Association of the Management of Nursing and Allied Health Science Institutions Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Karthik Stone Crushers Vs the Deputy Commissioner and Chairman