Partly allowed

M/S Radiant Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. v. Karnataka State Electronics

Karnataka HC1 Dec 2021WP/20620/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Karnataka High Court disposed of this writ petition by quashing the impugned Board order/resolution and subsequent communication. The relief was granted subject to the petitioner paying the remaining dues along with interest within two weeks, failing which the quashed orders would revive.

What did the court decide?

The impugned Annexures Q & R were quashed; the petitioner was directed to pay the remaining dues and interest within two weeks.

M/S Radiant Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. Vs Karnataka State… — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.20620 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

M/S. RADIANT INFOSYSTEMS PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTRED OFF AT NO.46, 7^TH B MAIN ROAD, JAYANGARA, 4^TH BLOCK BENGLURU - 560 011. REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR K.V. PRASHANTH

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. D.R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

KARNATAKA STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRCTOR 2^ND FLOOR, TTMC A BLOCK, BMTC, SHANTHINAGAR, K.H. ROAD, BENGLAURU - 560 027.

¶13

THE KEONICS (STATE OWNED UNDERTAKING) REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 2^ND FLOOR, TTMC A BLOCK, BMTC, SHANTHINAGAR, K.H. ROAD BENGLAURU - 560 027.

¶14

…RESPONDENTS

¶15

(BY SRI. G.SANJAY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)

¶16

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER / RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD DATED 9.1.2015 VIDE ANNEXURE-Q WHICH IS SOUGHT TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN TERMS OF COMMUNICATION DATED 25.10.2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-R PASSED BY THE R2.

¶17

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The subject matter of this writ petition is substantially

¶21

covered by the judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.846/2021 between M/s. SUSHEELA ASSOCIATES VS. KARNATAKA STATE ELECTRONICS & ANOTHER, disposed off on 18.02.2021, wherein reprieve has been granted to the litigant.

¶22

The above assertion of learned counsel for the petitioner is not much disputed by the learned Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents through Caveat; however, he contends that petitioner although had paid about 99% of the amount due, has not remitted the remainder i.e., about 1% and therefore, the relief of the kind which the Co-ordinate Bench has granted cannot be extended to the petitioner.

¶23

Learned counsel for petitioner at once submits

¶24

that he would instruct his client to pay all and whatever amount is due along with the interest admissible in law no sooner the intimation is received from the respondent and that his submission may be considered as undertaking

¶25

¶26

subject to whatever right to challenge the petitioner has. This is fair enough.

¶27

In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed off quashing the impugned Annexures -Q & R; petitioner is extended the same relief as has been granted to the litigant in the cognate case supra, however, subject to petitioner making good the remainder of the amount due along with interest accruing thereon within two weeks from the date an intimation is received from the respondents, failing which, the impugned orders now quashed shall revive on their own, as phoenix.

¶28

Costs made easy.

¶29

Sd/JUDGE

¶30

DS/JY

M/S Radiant Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. v. Karnataka State Electronics

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Radiant Infosystems Pvt. Ltd. v. Karnataka State Electronics

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bheema Naika Vs the State of Karnataka

A v Anantharaman Vs the Principal Secretary to the

M/S Rajeshwari Engineering Works Vs the State of Karnataka

All India Union Bank Officer'S Federation Vs Union Bank of India

M.G. Gangaiah Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Qball Max Sports Center Vs State of Karnataka