The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner based on oral submission in the absence of a physical memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.19426 OF 2015 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
MR. VITTAL NAYAK S/O. LATE SHYAMA NAYAK AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS STHANAADABETTU HOUSE, NEERE VILLAGE - 574 102. KARKALA TALUK
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K. SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
2
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. H. JAYAKARA SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 TO R7 ARE SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN FDP NO.36/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KARKALA AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Sri. K. Shashikanth Prasad, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that he has filed a memo for withdrawal of the above matter, the said memo has not been put up. However, taking into account the oral submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
GJM
Mr. Vittal Nayak
Mr. Baburaya Nayak
Smt. Kamala G. Nayak
Mr. Puttan Nayak
Smt. Susheela Nayak
Smt. Nethravathi Nayak
Sumant Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
