The Karnataka High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.18692/2021 filed under Article 226 challenging an order. The petition, which sought withdrawal via memo, was dismissed for default due to non-payment of court fee.
The writ petition stood dismissed for default due to non-payment of court fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO.18692/2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
SRI.S.KANDASWAMMY AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, S/O LATE SANJEEV, R/AT NO 25, 1ST CROSS, CUBBONPET, BANGALORE 560002
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MURALI N, ADVOCATE)
AND :
... RESPONDENTS
2
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE ORDER DATED 03.08.2021 PASSED BY THE 72ND ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU(CCH 73) IN O.S.NO.25765/2021 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G IS ILLEGAL AND QUASH THE SAME.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to place on record the memo dated 08.11.2021 for withdrawal of the petition.
The memo is taken on record. But it is seen that Court fee has not been paid.
Therefore, the petition stands dismissed for default.
SD/JUDGE
RB
SRI S KANDASWAMMY
SMT SHAZIA TABASSUM
SRI AIYAZUDDI S
B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
