Dismissed

Sri R K Sadanandagowda v. Boothegowda R K

Karnataka HC6 Feb 2021WP/1649/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners approached the High Court under Article 227 seeking disposal of interlocutory applications in O.S. No.201/2015 which was not present. The Court emphasized avoiding instructions for time-bound disposal on out-of-turn basis without trial court inquiry and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of without directing disposal of the applications by the trial court.

Sri R K Sadanandagowda Vs Boothegowda R K — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR. ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.1649/2018 (GM – CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN

¶8

SRI. R. K. SADANANDAGOWDA, W/O R. KAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

¶9

SRI. BALAPPA, S/O RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,

¶10

RANGANATHAPPA, S/O BOOTHANNA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,

¶11

SRI. BOOTHANNA, S/O BOOTHANNA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,

¶12

SRI. KARIYANNA, S/O RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,

¶13

ALL ARE R/AT K. RANGANAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SRI. MURALIDHARA G. S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))

¶16

¶17

AND

¶18

BOOTHEGOWDA R. K. S/O R. KAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS

¶19

NARAYANAPPA, S/O R. KAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,

¶20

CHAYAPATHI, S/O BOOTHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

¶21

KARIYANNA, S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

¶22

KARIYANNA, S/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

¶23

ALL ARE R/AT K. RANGANAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶24

PUTTAJUNJAIAH, S/O JUNJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT SIDDAPURA VILLAGE, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, BEVINAHALLI POST, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶25

HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, S/O NARASIMIAH, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS

¶26

NARASIMHAMURTHY, S/O HANUMANTHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,

¶27

¶28

9. MANJEGOWDA, S/O MANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

¶29

RESPONDENT NO.7 TO 9 ARE R/AT HOSUR VILLAGE, GOWDAGERE HOBLI SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶30

B. R. KAREGOWDA, S/O LATE B. N. RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT KALUVARAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶31

H. J. NARASIMHAMURTHY, S/O JUNJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT HOSUR, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶32

S. LINGAIAH, S/O SANNALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT DANDIKERE, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶33

K. NAGARAJU, S/O KARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT HONNENAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶34

¶35

KAUSHIK GOWDA, S/O R. K. SADANANDAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/AT RANGANAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶36

K. DODDAIAH, S/O KATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT RANGANAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶37

K. S. RAJAKUMAR, S/O SANNANARASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, KUMBARAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶38

PUTTASWAMI, S/O VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, GOMARADAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶39

D. VIVEKANANDA, S/O DODDATHIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT GOMASADA HALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶40

¶41

THIPPESWAMY, S/O LAKSHMINARASIMHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT J.HOSAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DIS – 572 137.

¶42

RAMEGOWDA, S/O MADDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT J. HOSAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶43

H. B. JUNJEGOWDA, S/O BUTHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶44

H. B. ERANNA, S/O BADDIRANNA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT J. HOSAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶45

G. RAMESH (GOWDA), S/O GOVINDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT GOWDAGERE VILLAGE AND HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶46

HANUMANTHAPPA, S/O VENKATACHALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

¶47

¶48

R/AT GOWDAGERE VILLAGE AND HOBLI SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶49

NARAYANGOWDA, S/O GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT SHANKAPURA, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶50

L. BASAVARAJU, S/O LINGAIAG M., AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT HOSUR VILLAGE, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶51

PUTTAJUNGAIAH, S/O RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT HOSUR VILLAGE, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶52

RANGASWAMAIAH, S/O RANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT KOLUVARANAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶53

H. M. THIPPASWAMY, S/O MUDDRANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT HERUR VILLAGE, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶54

¶55

H. LAKSMIRAJU, S/O HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT HERUR VILLAGE, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶56

ALLURAPPA, S/O DODDAHANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT DYAGERHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶57

K. KARIYANNA, S/O KARIYANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT MUDDENAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶58

KARIYANNA, S/O D. K. HANUMANTHEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT DYAGEREHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶59

H. NAGARAJU, S/O HULIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT MUDDENAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶60

¶61

P. RAMESH, S/O PUTTARANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NARAYANAPURA PALYA, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶62

H. B. NAGANNA, S/O LATE BYRALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT HUNASEHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶63

JAYANNA, S/O JUNJANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT K. RANGANAHALLI, GOWDAGER HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶64

R. B. BUTHESH, S/O R. B. RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT K. RANGANAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶65

C. ERANNA, S/O CHITHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT KUMBARAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶66

¶67

KRISHNAMURTHY, S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT K. RANGANAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶68

SOMANNA, S/O MALLANNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT GANASADAHALLI, GOWDAGERE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶69

TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICER, SIRA TALUK, TUMAKUR DISTRICT – 572 137.

¶70

CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDA, BANGALORE – 560 001.

¶71

... RESPONDENTS

¶72

(BY SRI.VIKRAM HUILGOL, AGA FOR R-42 AND 43)

¶73

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT TO PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AT SIRE, TO DISPOSE THE APPLICATIONS ON IA No.1 AND 2/15 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN O.S.NO.201/2015 AT ANNEXURE – D AND E AND ETC.,

¶74

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶75

¶76

ORDER

¶77

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners is not present.

¶78

The only prayer made in this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is to direct the Principal Civil Judge, Sira to dispose of the pending interlocutory applications. Prayer (a) is the only substantive prayer which reads thus:

¶79

“(a) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Principal Civil Judge at Sira, to dispose the applications on I.A. No.1 and 2/15 filed bys the petitioners in O.S. No.201/2015 at Annexure-D and E.”

¶80

As far as possible, a Constitutional Court should avoid

¶81

issuing a direction to the Trial Courts and the Appellate Courts to dispose of a particular proceeding within a time bound manner. If

¶82

a litigant wants disposal of a proceedings on out of turn basis, he

¶83

must first apply to the concerned Court before which the proceedings are pending. Only if the concerned Court declines

¶84

¶85

the said prayer, the litigant/party can invoke the provisions under

¶86

Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

¶87

Subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is

disposed of.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE

Sri R K Sadanandagowda v. Boothegowda R K

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri R K Sadanandagowda v. Boothegowda R K

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Falcon Tyres Employees House Building Co-Operative Society Ltd. Vs Sri. Ashwin Pai

Sri Sanjay Balakrishna Vs Mrs Shaila Darshan

Mr B Mahadeva Vs Smt Nirmala

Vijayalakshmi Vs Sri v S Mohankumar

Sri S Lokesh Reddy Vs Sri M Narayanappa

Sri S Lokesh Reddy Vs Sri. M. Narayanappa