On a preliminary hearing of a writ petition under Article 227 seeking to quash an order for production of documents, the court was informed that the parties had settled their dispute. The petition was held to be infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
No; the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous due to settlement of the dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 15597/2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
SMT. SHANTAMMA S/O LATE CHENNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS R/AT CHORGALLU GRAMA MALLIPATTANA HOBLI, ARAKALAGURU TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT – 534 342.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATESH R BHAGAT, ADVOCATE)
AND :
2
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.P.P. JAYAKUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER AT ANNEXURE-A DATED 07.02.2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARKALGUDU, HASSAN DISTRICT IN R.A.NO.5/2013 ON I.A.NO.3 FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 27 R/W SECTION 151 SEEKING FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENT.
3
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R
Sri. Venkatesh R. Bhagat, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and an appropriate application is also filed before the appellate Court and therefore the petition is rendered infructuous.
In the light of this submission, the petition stands
disposed of as having become infructuous.
SD/JUDGE
AN/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition under Article 227 to quash the impugned order should be allowed.
Whether the dispute between the petitioner and respondents has been settled amicably.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shantamma
Lalithamma
Lolamma
Chandramma
Sarojamma
Sakamma
B. M. Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
