The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for default due to non-compliance with repeated opportunities to file office objections.
no relief granted
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 15588/2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
... PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. SHYLAJA S V., ADVOCATE)
AND :
2
1ST MAIN ROAD MARENAHALLI VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU – 560 040.
3
... RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER INCULDING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 17.02.2021 PASSED IN OS NO. 1878/2009 ON THE FILE OF XXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, (CCH NO.9) COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Despite repeated opportunities, the office
objections have not been complied with. Therefore, the
petition stands dismissed for default.
SD/JUDGE
nv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in default of office objections.
The Commissioner Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Rep by its Head Legal Cell N R Square, Bengaluru
Smt. Shylaja Prakash
Smt Y N Lakshmi Narasu
The Commissioner The Bangalore Development Authority
V S Munirathnam
Sri G Subramani
B. M. Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
