Chief Justice Oka disposed of Writ Petition No.15407 of 2020, relying on a concurrent judgment. The impugned notice was set aside. The respondents were permitted to adopt appropriate legal proceedings, and the petition was partly allowed.
The impugned notice at Annexure-A was set aside; respondents permitted to adopt appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.15407 OF 2020 (GM-MM-S)
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAJU .D KALLI SON OF DURGAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS RESIDING AT LAKSHMESWARA MUNDARGI TALUK GADAG DISTRICT PIN CODE - 582 116.
... PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SUMAN HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA .P.M, ADVOCATE) AND:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001 2 . THE JOINT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY NORTH ZONE BELLARY - 583 101 3 . SENIOR GEOLOGIST (ORE) MINES AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT GADAG PIN CODE - 583 101
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI. I. TARANATH POOJARY, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 31.08.2020 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT-2 AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Issue notice to the respondents.
The learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.
There is no dispute that this petition is governed by the
order passed today in Writ Petition No.815 of 2021.
Therefore, for the reasons recorded in the said order, we
pass the following order:
i) The impugned notice at Annexure-A is set aside;
ii) However, it will be open for the respondents to adopt appropriate proceedings in accordance with law;
iii) The writ petition is partly allowed on the above terms.
Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/JUDGE
CA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the notice issued by Respondent-2 should be set aside in light of the identical order passed in Writ Petition No.815 of 2021.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.815 of 2021Applied¶21
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. Raju .D Kalli
State of Karnataka
Abhay S. Oka
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
