Allowed

Sri H Raja Reddy v. National Highways Authority of India

Karnataka HC21 Oct 2021WP/15330/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows joint writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court directed Respondent No. 2 to consider specific representations dated 23.06.2021 filed by the petitioners and pass an appropriate order within one month.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No. 2 to consider representations dated 23.06.2021 and pass appropriate order within one month.

Sri H Raja Reddy Vs National Highways Authority of India — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶2

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.15330 OF 2021 (LA-RES)

¶6

C/W

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO.15308 OF 2021

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. H RAJA REDDY S/O. OBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.1/1, SY. NO.97, NETTAGERE BOLARE VILLAGE KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE, KARNATAKA.

¶10

...PETITIONER IN W.P.No.15330/2021

¶11

SRI. H.C. NAGARAJU S/O CHIKKA VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT No.36, OLD No.54, SY.NO.97 NETTAGERE BOLARE VILLAGE KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU, KARNATAKA.

¶12

...PETITIONER IN W.P.No.15308/2021

¶13

(BY SRI. PAWAN SHYAM A., ADVOCATE)

¶14

¶15

AND:

¶16

1 . NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT BASAVANAPURA (RAMADEVARAPADA) RAMANAGARA – 562 128 REPRESENTED BY PROJECT DIRECTOR

¶17

2 . SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY NATIONAL HIGHWAY-209 MALAVALLI, MANDYA DISTRICT

¶18

…COMMON RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SMT. SRUTI C. CHAGANTI, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 AND R-2)

¶20

WRIT PETITION NOS.15330/2021 & 15308/2021 ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 23.06.2021 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO R-2 PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANNX-H AT PAGE NOS.45 AND 29, RESPECTIVELY, AND ETC.

¶21

THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

The petitioners have filed the present writ petitions seeking for a mandamus to consider the representations dated 23.06.2021, as per Annexure-H

¶24

¶25

(in both the petitions), and to pass suitable orders, in

¶26

accordance with law.

¶27

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is granted to respondent No.2, respondent No.2 will consider the representations and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law.

¶28

The submission of learned counsel for the respondents is placed on record.

¶29

The writ petitions are allowed. Respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representations dated 23.06.2021, Annexure-H (in both the petitions), and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

SD/JUDGE

¶31

Sri H Raja Reddy v. National Highways Authority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri H Raja Reddy v. National Highways Authority of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Sree Shaila Kumar G S Vs National Highway Authority of India India

Ms. Zohreh Elyasi Vs Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences

Shanti Dhama College of Physiotherapy Vs the Principal Secretary

V Krishnappa S/O V.B. Venkataramaiah Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri G Krishnappa Vs Smt U R Chandrakala

Master Kushal K . P.R Vs the State of Karnataka