Disposed

Jayaram Naik S v. the Principal Secretary

Karnataka HC7 Sept 2021WP/15328/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two shareholders of a co-operative bank filed a writ petition invoking Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking directions to initiate legal action against specific individuals. The Court, accepting the AGA's submission, kept all contentions open on law and facts and disposed of the petition without deciding the merits.

What did the court decide?

All contentions kept open on law and facts; no specific relief granted in this order.

Jayaram Naik S Vs the Principal Secretary — Karnataka HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.15328 OF 2021(CS-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

JAYARAM NAIK S, SHAREHOLDER, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, SREE THYAGARAJ CO-OPERATIVE BANK, NO.11, 1^ST MAIN, GSBF APARTMENT, KRISHNARAJLAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 076.

¶9

SMT. MAMATHA C

¶10

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SHAREHOLDER, SREE THAYAGARAJ CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.68, 3^RD CROSS, ANJANEYA LAYOUT,

¶11

BANGALORE-560085.

¶12

KUMUDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SHAREHOLDER, SREE THAYAGARAJ CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.68, 3^RD CROSS, ANJANEYA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 085.

¶13

H B JAYARAMA,

¶14

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, NO.458, 4^TH MAIN, 1^ST CROSS, AUSTIN TOWN, BENGALURU-560 008.

¶15

GANGANNA B,

¶16

AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, NO.68, JYOTHI NIVAS COLLEGE, 1^ST MAIN, 6^TH CROSS, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 034.

¶17

¶18

MUNIYAPPA C, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, SHAREHOLDER, SREE THAYAGARAJ CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.84/1, 1^ST MAIN, 2^ND CROSS, GANGADHARA NAGAR, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 078.

¶19

RATHNAMMA C, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SHAREHOLDER, SREE THAYAGARAJ CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.84/1, 1^ST MAIN, 2^ND CROSS, GANGADHARA NAGAR, KANAKAPURA MIAN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 078.

¶20

MOINUDDIN S H, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, SHAREHOLDER, SREE THAYAGARAJ CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.3013, 2^ND BLCOK, JANAPRIYA TOWERSHIP, KODABAGERE POST, MAGADI – 562 130.

¶21

NINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, SHAREHOLDER, SREE THAYAGARAJ CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.12/1, MUNESHWARA LAYOUT, KOGIGEHALLI, BANGALORE – 560 092.

¶22

YASMIN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, SHAREHOLDER, SREE THAYAGARAJ CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.3013, 2^ND BLOCK, JANAPRIYA TOWESHIP, KADOBAGERE POST, MAGADI – 562 130.

¶23

SUNITHA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, SHAREHOLDER, SREE THAYAGARAJ CO-OPERATIVE BANK NO.12/1, MUNESHWARA LAYOUT, KOGIGEHALLI, BANGALORE – 560 092.

¶24

...PETITIONERS

¶25

(BY SRI. MARUTHI S, ADVOCATE)

¶26

¶27

AND:

¶28

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, 3^RD FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, AMEDKARVEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 052.

¶29

REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NO.1, ALI ASKER ROAD, BANGALORE-560 052.

¶30

THE DIRECTOR OF COOPERATIVE AUDIT, NO.17, JAYANIVASA, SHANKAR MUTT ROAD, BAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE-560 004.

¶31

THE ASSISTANT MANAGER OFFICE OF THE URBAN CELL, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, NO.10/3/8, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶32

… RESPONDENTS

¶33

(BY SRI. VINOD KUMAR, AGA)

¶34

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS THE TRUE COPIES OF WHICH ARE PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-K SERIES AND CONSEQUENTLY ISSUE DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO INITIATE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE PRESIDENT IN CLOUDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SREE THYAGARAJA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED.

¶35

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

¶36

¶37

ORDER

¶38

The short grievance of the petitioners as to non-

¶39

consideration of their representation at Annexure-K can be addressed by the jurisdictional respondents in accordance with law as rightly submitted by learned AGA.

¶40

Learned AGA’s contention that all points should be

¶41

kept open both on law and facts, being fair, is accepted.

¶42

In the above circumstances, this writ petition is

¶43

disposed off, All contentions having been kept open.

¶44

Time for compliance, three months.

¶45

Now, no costs.

¶46

Sd/JUDGE

¶47

Bsv

Jayaram Naik S v. the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayaram Naik S v. the Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. M K Jayaramaiah Vs Government of Karnataka

Sri K R Thippeswamy Vs the State of Karnataka

Mr Vikas S/O Surendranath R S Vs State of Karnataka

Mr.Prakash B v Vs Mrs. Shashikala Prakash

B Gopinath Shet Vs the State of Karnataka

H. Shrinivasa Achar Vs Managing Director