Disposed

Karnataka Commercial and v. Bangalore Metro Rail

Karnataka HC29 Sept 2021WP/14968/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, on a joint suggestion of both parties, disposed of the writ petition requesting setting aside of a stay order on execution of an award. The Court directed the lower court to hear and dispose of the matter within three months, with all contentions left open.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Court below to hear and dispose of the matter within three months.

Karnataka Commercial and Vs Bangalore Metro Rail — Arbitration | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 29^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.14968 OF 2021(GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

KARNATAKA COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT 28, BELLARY ROAD, GANGENAHALLI, DENA BANK, BENGALURU – 560 032. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR.P.BARANITHARAN.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI.ADITYA NARAYAN, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED BMTC COMPLEX, 3^RD FLOOR, K H ROAD, SHATINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 027. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

¶13

SECURTIY AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICES (INDIA) LIMITED HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT #106, RAMANASHREE ARCADE, 1^ST FLOOR, 18^TH M.G. ROAD, TRINITY CIRCLE, BENGALURU – 560 001. REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY.

¶14

… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SRIRANGA S, ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 IS D/WITH; V.C.O DATED 27.08.2021)

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

¶16

¶17

ORDER DATED 02.08.2021 PASSED BY THE LXXXII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE; BANGALORE (CCH-83) IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.84/2020 ANNEXURE-A ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT IT RESTRAIN THE PETITIONER FROM EXECUTING THE AWARD DATED 06.03.2020 AGAINST THE R1.

¶18

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Both the sides are graciously in agreement with the suggestion of this Court that the proceedings in the Court below be processed expeditiously; that on the basis of the outcome thereof, the case for the execution of award will arise; that all contentions of the parties be kept open; the aspersions cast on the petitioner’s counsel be treated as having been given up.

¶21

Ordered accordingly and the petition stands disposed off requesting the learned judge of the Court below to hear & dispose off the matter at his hands within a period of three months.

¶22

No costs.

¶23

Sd/JUDGE

¶24

Bsv

Karnataka Commercial and v. Bangalore Metro Rail

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karnataka Commercial and v. Bangalore Metro Rail

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Kokila Vs Recovery Officer

Sri H M Ramachandra Vs State of Karnataka

Economic Transport Oraganisation Limited Vs State Bank of India

P Vishwak Sena Reddy Vs the Commissioner

Sri C v. Bhanumarthy Reddy Vs the Commissioner

Mohammed Numaan Asad Vs the Joint Registrar of