Sri Tippe Swamy P v. Sri Vijaya Kumar B
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition seeking to set aside an impugned order of the State Administrative Tribunal as it had rendered infructuous.
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition seeking to set aside an impugned order of the State Administrative Tribunal as it had rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. DESAI
WRIT PETITION No.12834/2017 (S-KAT)
BETWEEN :
Sri. Tippe Swamy P. Aged about 56 Years, S/o T. Palayya, Assistant Conservator of Forest, Koodligi Territorial Sub-Division, Koodligi - 583 135, Bellary District.
...Petitioner
(By Sri. Vijaya Kumar, Advocate)
AND :
- 2 -
…Respondents
(By Sri. C. Jagadeish, Advocate for R.1; Sri. T.P. Sreenivas, AGA for R.2; Respondent No.3 served)
This Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to issue of impugned order dated 20.03.2017 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru in Application No.91/2017 vide Annexure-A and after perusal set aside the same.
This petition coming on for Orders, this day, S. Sujatha, J ., made the following:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the writ petition does not survive for consideration.
The said submission is placed on record.
Writ petition stands dismissed as having
rendered infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
LL
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Tippe Swamy P.
Vijaya Kumar B.
State of Karnataka
Principal Chief Conservator of Forest
Deputy Conservator of Forest
S. SUJATHA
P.N. DESAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court