The petitioner sought to quash a communication terminating a contract. On withdrawal of the writ petition, the court disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.12557 OF 2017(GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
M/S SAS CARGO, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, HAVING THEIR REGISTERED OFFICE, AT NO.36, 7TH MAIN, MALAKAPPA GARDEN, S.R.NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 027. DULY REPRESENTED BY THEIR PARTNER, SRI.SYED SAJUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O SYED SHAMSHUDDIN. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. A RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ABHINAY Y T, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RELEVANT RECORDS AND QUASH ANNEX-K, THE COMMUNICATION FROM THE R-2, DATED 22.02.2017 TERMINATING THE CONTRACT FOR 5 TON SLRD SPECE (ONE UNIT) IN TRAIN NO.12253-EX-YPR TO BGP AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
2
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking withdrawal of the writ petition.
Accordingly, petition stands disposed off as having
been withdrawn in terms of the memo filed.
Sd/JUDGE
Bsv
M/s Sas Cargo, A Partnership Firm
Union of India
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
