L. Puttahanumegowda v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a thin order disposing of a writ petition as infructuous after the elections in question had already been conducted.
This is a thin order disposing of a writ petition as infructuous after the elections in question had already been conducted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.11766 OF 2020 (CS-EL-M)
BETWEEN :
2
3
4
W/O BETTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS SHARE NO. 82/1,
5
SHARE NO. 130/1
6
7
W/O SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS SHARE NO.170/1
8
SHARE NO. 195/1
PETITIONER NO.1 TO 59 ARE ALL RESIDENTS OF ALAHADAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI MALAVALLI TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 401
9
10
11
W/O PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SHARE NO. 94/1
12
SHARE NO.121/1
13
14
S/O. LINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS SHARE NO. 28/1
15
SHARE NO. 41/1
16
17
S/O. NAGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS SHARE NO. 76/1
136. NAGAMMA
18
SHARE NO. 94/2
19
155. MADESHA
20
S/O MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS SHARE NO. 137/2
21
SHARE NO. 144/2
164. DEVERAMMA W/O. KUNNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SHARE NO. 145/2
22
23
S/O. RANGAREDDY EREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS SHARE NO. 154/1
24
SHARE NO. 164/1
25
26
S/O. NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SHARE NO. 199/1
27
SHARE NO. 25/2,
28
29
W/O. NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS SHARE NO. 45/2
236. BILIGOWDA
30
SHARE NO. 60/1
239. JAYAMMA W/O. CHIKKEGOWDA @ DODDATHAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS SHARE NO. 55/2
31
PETITIONER NOS. 121 TO 246 ARE ALL R/O CHANNIPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571 401
247. MADEGOWDA
S/O. CHAMEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS SHARE NO.3/1
254. HONNEGOWDA
32
S/O. MOTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS SHARE NO.15/1
260. MAHESHA
33
SHARE NO.44/2
263. SIDDAMMA W/O. BOREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS SHARE NO.45/2
34
275. PRAKASH
S/O. MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SHARE NO. 38/1
35
S/O. MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SHARE NO.44/1
281. NAGESH
285. SAKAMMA
36
SHARE NO. 53/1
288. HONNEGOWDA
S/O. MUTTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS SHARE NO. 56/1
37
38
S/O BETTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SHARE NO. 88/1
39
SHARE NO. 126/1
40
41
W/O. BETTEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS SHARE NO.173/1
330. MADEGOWDA S/O. SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS SHARE NO.174/1
335. NAGAMMA
42
SHARE NO. 184/1
340. NAGAMMA
342. KRISHNA
43
PETITIONER NO.247 TO 348 ARE ALL RESIDENTS OF KAMSAGARA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MALLAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571 401
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.D. R. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND :
44
… RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1, R3, R4 & R5; SRI. G. V. SHASHIKUMAR, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT 97TH AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION BY INSERTING PART IXB TO THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 368(2) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ALSO AGAINST THE BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ARTCILE 246(3) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ETC,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Shri.D.R.Ravishankar, learned advocate for the petitioners, Smt. Rashmi Patel, learned HCGP for the State and Shri G.V.Shashi Kumar, learned advocate for respondent No.2.
45
No costs.
Sd/JUDGE
MH/-
L. Putthanumegowda & Ors.
The State of Karnataka & Ors.
P.S. Dinesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court