Smt Nandamma v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of Sections 79-A to 80 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, was disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioners.
Writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of Sections 79-A to 80 of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, was disposed of as withdrawn by the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
WRIT PETITION NO.11659 OF 2008 (LR-RES)
BETWEEN:
3 . SMT. G. VANITHA W/O SRI G. PRABHU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESIDING AT G-3, BRIGADE NEST 619/A, 4TH CROSS AIR PORT ROAD BANGALORE - 560 017
4 . SMT. G. KOKILA W/O A. VINOD KUMAR AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.41 3RD CROSS, 10TH MAIN
INDIRANAGAR, 2ND STAGE BANGALORE - 560 038
... PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI. SAMMITH .S, ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. L.K. SRINIVAS MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001
2 . THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS NEW DELHI
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI. VIJAYAKUMAR .A PATIL, AGA FOR R1 SHRI. B. PRAMOD, CGC FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH SECTIONS 79-A, 79-B, 79-C AND 80 OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REFORMS ACT, 1961 IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AND DECLARE THE SAME AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has
filed a memo of today's date for withdrawal.
Accordingly, we dispose of the petition as withdrawn with
liberty as prayed in the second paragraph of the memo.
The pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and stands disposed of.
Sd/CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/JUDGE
CA
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SMT. NANDAMMA W/O LATE SRI M. GOVINDAPPA AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE UNION OF INDIA
ABHAY S. OKA
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court