The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution as the petitioner was absent on the last date of hearing and on the day of hearing, resulting in non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.11540/2020 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
MRS.W.GLADIES JAYANTHI W/O SRI NAGALINGAM AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS NO.6/1, MURUGESH MUDALIAR STREET, AKKITHIMMANAHALLI, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560027
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.KAVITHA.D, ADV. [ABSENT])
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER FROM ANNEXURE-C TO C2.
2
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
None appears for the petitioner on the last date of
hearing and also today.
non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
VM
MRS.W.GLADIES JAYANTHI
CANARA BANK
SRI GOPI KANAGARAJ
P.S.DINESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
