Sri Tayaru Vitalamurthy v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED…
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO.11527 OF 2019 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN:
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VARUN J PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
2
M.S. BUILDING, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 01, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
(BY SRI. VINOD KUMAR AGA FOR R1; SRI. N. RAMACHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. T.L. KIRAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION 28[5] OF THE KARNATAKA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT IS ULTRA VIRES THE LEGISLATIVE COMPETENCE AND ARTICLE 243ZJ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
It is submitted at the Bar that the prayer sought in
this writ petition has been rendered infructuous and accordingly the same may be disposed off.
Placing the said submission on record, This writ
petition is disposed off as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Bsv
Tayar Vatalamurthy & Ors.
The State of Karnataka
Krishna S. Dixit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court