Allowed
Sri Veerabhadrappa v. Sri Narayana Swamy
Karnataka HCWP/11321/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the writ petition under Article 227, holding that an error apparent on the face of the record existed where the trial court refused to frame an additional issue despite significant changes in pleadings. It set aside the impugned order and directed the trial court to frame the additional issue sought by the petitioner. Four months later, the trial court was directed to dispos
What did the court decide?
The writ petition succeeded; the impugned order was set aside; an application by the petitioner was favored by directing the learned judge to frame an additional issue.