Smt.Kavita W/O Rajesh Pradeep v. Sri.Rajesh S/O Pradeep Bhandari
Case brief
What is this about?
On a petition to quash orders, the court dismissed the writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's application.
On a petition to quash orders, the court dismissed the writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO. 112556 OF 2019 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT.KAVITA W/O RAJESH PRADEEP, BHANDARI,AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: LECTURER, R/O: PLOT NO.118, OLD BADAMI NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580023.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VISHWANATH S. BICHAGATTI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI.RAJESH S/O PRADEEP BHANDARI, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, C/O: KALIL AHMED MONIN, PLOT NO:68/5, MONIN BUILDING NEAR HUBBALLI DHARWAD CORPORATION OLD BADAMI NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580023.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M. KUSUMAKARA, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 28.05.2019 PASSED ON I.A.4 VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.08.2019 IN M.C.NO.113/2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-F PENDING ON THE FILES OF HON'BLE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI.
2
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a
memo dated 13.09.2021 seeking permission of the
Court for withdrawing the present petition as having become infructuous.
Said memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
SD JUDGE
AM
Smt. Kavita W/o Rajesh Pradeep, Bhandari
Sri. Rajesh S/o Pradeep Bhandari
S.R. Krishna Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court