Disposed

Sadanand S/O Narayan Naik v. District Legal Services Authority

Karnataka HC15 Sept 2021WP/110702/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of writ petitions seeking prohibition under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution. It directed the respondents to consider an unacted representation and pass appropriate orders within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 17.05.2019 and pass an appropriate order within three months.

Sadanand S/O Narayan Naik Vs District Legal Services Authority — Karnataka HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶2

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.110702/2019 & WRIT PETITION NOS.110892-898/2019 (GM-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

1 . SADANAND S/O NARAYAN NAIK AGED 56, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/79/1998.

¶8

2 . ISHWAR S/O MABLA LNAIK AGED 42, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/2092/1999.

¶9

3 . IRESH S/O FAKIRA CHALAVADI AGED 42, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/286/2008

¶10

4 . HARISH M. NAYAK AGED 42, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/377/2002

¶11

5 . DANAPPA S/O BANGARAPPA BANAVASI AGED 40, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/4273/2006

¶12

¶13

6 . LINGARAJ S/O BANGARAPPA GOUDA AGED 63, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/631/1989

¶14

7 . SHASHIKIRANA S/O PUNDALIK NAIK AGED 38, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/3311/2005

¶15

8 . GANESH S/O NARAYAN PUJARI AGED 29, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/1053/2015

¶16

9 . MARUTI S/O MANJUNATH NILEKANI AGED 49, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/2092/1999

¶17

10 . RAMACHANDRA S/O SUBRAY BHAT AGED 67, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/74/1986

¶18

11 . JAGADESH S/O MOHAN NAIK AGED 47, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/73/1998

¶19

12 . SMT. REVATI H. AGED 34, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O: SIRSI BAR ASSOCIATION, COURT COMPLEX, SIRSI-581401, KAR/2975/2009

¶20

...PETITIONERS

¶21

(BY SRI. ANANT HEDGE AND

¶22

SRI. VISHWANATH HEGDE, ADVOCATES)

¶23

¶24

AND:

¶25

1 . DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY KARWAR, REP. BY MEMBER SECRETARY, COURT COMPLEX, KARWAR.

¶26

2 . CHAIRMAN DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, COURT COMPLEX, KARWAR.

¶27

3 . MEMBER SECRETARY DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, COURT COMPLEX, KARWAR.

¶28

... RESPONDENTS

¶29

(BY SRI. MRUTYUNJAYA TATA BANGI, ADVOCATE)

¶30

THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF PROHIBITION AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS FROM TAKING FURTHER STEPS/DECISION PURSUANT TO INTERVIEW ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN HELD ON 08.06.2019 TILL THE APPROPRIATE ORDERS ARE PASSED BY THE RESPONDENTS ON THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17.05.2019 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-F IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE & ETC.

¶31

THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶32

ORDER

¶33

In these writ petitions, the petitioners have

¶34

sought for the following reliefs:

¶35

i. Issue writ of prohibition against the respondents from taking further steps/decision pursuant to interview alleged to have been held on

¶36

¶37

08.06.2019 till the appropriate orders are passed by the respondents on the representation dated 17.05.2019 marked at Annexure-F in the interest of justice.

¶38

ii. Issue any other order or directions as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to pass in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶39

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners

¶40

and learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the material on record.

¶41

It is the grievance of the petitioners that their representation dated 17.05.2019 marked at Annexure-F submitted to the respondents has not been considered so far by them nor any order has been passed on the same. Under these

¶42

circumstances, the petitioners are before this Court by way of the present petitions.

¶43

Per contra, learned counsel for the

¶44

respondents submits that if reasonable time is given,

¶45

¶46

they would consider and pass necessary order on the said representation.

¶47

In view of the aforesaid facts and

¶48

circumstances and rival submissions, respondents are hereby directed to address the grievances of the petitioners and consider their representation dated 17.05.2019 at Annexure-F and pass appropriate order

¶49

in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶50

With the aforesaid directions, the petitions stand disposed off.

¶51

SD JUDGE

¶52

CLK

Sadanand S/O Narayan Naik v. District Legal Services Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadanand S/O Narayan Naik v. District Legal Services Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kum.Ranjana Bala Naik Vs the Commissioner/Appellate Authority

Ravishankar S/O Basavaraj Bhooplapur Vs Captian Suresh S/O Sadashiv Hallikere

The Terdal Minority Co-Operative Vs the State of Karnataka

Concan Specialised Engineering Vs Military Engineer Services

Sri. G. Ramakrishnamraju S/O Ram Raju Vs Smt. Yallamma W/O Shankrappa

Shri.Yallappa S/O Satappa Dabbagol Vs Smt.Gangavva W/O Satteppa Dabbagol