Ninganagouda v. Vinay Rajashekharappa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Writ Petition No.108900/2016 because the counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking to withdraw the petition, which was granted on 11 June 2021.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO.108900/2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN :
- SRI NIGANAGOUDA S/O BUDANAGOUDA PATIL SINCE DECEASED BY HIS L.RS.,
- 1(A). SHJANKARAGOUDA S/O NIGANAGOUDA PATIL, AGED AOBUT 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O JAYANAGAR CROSS, SAPTAPUR, DHARWAD, TQ: & DIST: DHARWAD.
- 1(B). DEVENDRAGOUDA S/O NIGANAGOUDA PATIL, AGED AOBUT YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O JAYANAGAR CROSS, SAPTAPUR, DHARWAD, TQ: & DIST: DHARWAD.
- .. PETITIONERS
(BY SRI G.I.GACHCHINAMATH, ADV.)
AND :
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sri Niganagouda S/o Budanagouda Patil Since Deceased By His L.Rs.
- respondent
Sri Vinay Rajashekharappa Kulkarni
- respondent
Sri Mallikarjun Ishwarappa Pujar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/108900/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court