Dismissed

Smt. Kamal Baburao Supannavar v. the Regional Commissioner

Karnataka HC14 Sept 2021WP/107791/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 16.08.2018 and pass appropriate orders within four months without evaluating the merits, reserving liberty for additional submissions.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the representation of 16.08.2018 within four months and pass appropriate orders.

Smt. Kamal Baburao Supannavar Vs the Regional… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶2

DATED THIS THE 14^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.107791/2018 (GM-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN

¶7

SMT. KAMAL BABURAO SUPANNAVAR, AGE: 74 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED, R/O: HOUSE NO.1067, GANPAT GALLI, MAJAGAVI, BELAGAVI-590008.

¶8

SHRI.PADMANATH BABURAO SUPANNAVAR AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HOUSE NO.1067, GANPAT GALLI, MAJAGAVI, BELAGAVI-590008.

¶9

...PETITIONERS

¶10

(BY SRI SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND :

¶12

THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI.

¶13

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI.

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER, CITY CORPORATION BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI.

¶15

¶16

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SUB-DIVISION, BELAGAVI.

¶17

…..RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI V.S.KALASURMATH, HCGP FOR R-1, 2 AND 4) (BY SRI BHUSHAN KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R-3)

¶19

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 16.08.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS AND PAY COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONERS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

¶20

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT, MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

ORDER

¶22

In this writ petition, the petitioners have sought for the following reliefs.

¶23

Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 16.08.2018 vide Annexure-C and pass appropriate orders and pay compensation to the petitioners in the interest of justice and equity.

¶24

¶25

Though several contentions are urged by the

¶26

petitioners in support of their claim, having regard to the specific assertions on the part of the petitioners that their representation at Annexure-C dated 16.08.2018 has not been considered by the respondents and no orders have been passed so far, without expressing any opinion on the merits/ demerits of the rival contentions, I deem it just and proper to dispose off this writ petition directing the concerned respondents to consider the said representation, if not already considered, in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly.

¶27

Liberty is also reserved in favour of the petitioners to submit the additional representation along with documents which shall be considered by the concerned respondent before passing orders as stated supra .

¶28

Subject to the aforesaid direction and liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners, writ petition stands disposed off.

¶29

SD JUDGE

¶30

CKK

Smt. Kamal Baburao Supannavar v. the Regional Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Kamal Baburao Supannavar v. the Regional Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Mangala W/O Ramesh Madiwalar Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Neelam W/O Shripad Betgeri Vs the Deputy Commissioner Haveri District

Ramesh S/O Ramachandra Malavade Vs the State of Karnataka

Kum.Ranjana Bala Naik Vs the Commissioner/Appellate Authority

Ravishankar S/O Basavaraj Bhooplapur Vs Captian Suresh S/O Sadashiv Hallikere

The Terdal Minority Co-Operative Vs the State of Karnataka