Dismissed
Dr.Roopali Desai v. State of Karnataka
Karnataka HCWP/106660/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
W.P. No.106660/2019 (EDN-AD)
BETWEEN
DR.ROOPALI DESAI W/O DR. RAVI NEMAGOUDA, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: GOVERNMENT SERVICE, R/O 43/1 5TH BLOCK, G.O. QUARTERS, KIMS, VIDYANAGAR, HUBLI.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI.RAMESH B KALE, ADVOCATE)
AND
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.G.K.HIREGOUDAR, GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR R1-R2, SRI.R.M.KULKARNI, ADV. FOR R3
: 2 :
THIS PETITION IS FILED PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING 2ND RESPONDENT TO DECLARE THE SEAT MATRIX EVERY YEAR WELL IN ADVANCE TO THE NEET EXAMINATION OF THE SAID ACADEMIC YEAR, QUASH RULE 10(4) OF THE KARNATAKA CONDUCT OF ENTRANCE TEST FOR ADMISSION TO GRADUATWE MEDICAL DEGREE AND DIPLOMA COURSES RULES, 2006, AS ULTRA VIRES TO ARTICLE 19(i)(g) OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA 1950 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner’s counsel has filed a memo stating that the writ petition has become infructuous, for this reason the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed.
Memo is placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
sh
Dr. Roopali Desai w/o Dr. Ravi Nemagouda
State of Karnataka
Directorate of Medical Education
Karnataka Examinations Authority
Sreenivas Harish Kumar
E.S. Indiresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court